The paper introduces a reverse sign‑language dictionary that recognizes signs from continuous signing without relying on gloss labels. It does this by first captioning a sign‑level video clip into a free‑form procedural description using an open‑weight vision‑language model, then retrieving the closest entry from a multilingual sentence encoder’s vocabulary of target descriptions. Experiments on a Japanese Sign Language dialogue corpus show that fine‑tuning the captioner boosts seen‑class retrieval from 4.5 % to 49 % and improves unseen‑class retrieval from 11.5 % to 21 %, approaching the performance of a standard closed‑set classifier while enabling open‑vocabulary recognition.
By Santiago Poveda-Guti\'errez, Hideki Nakayama, Mayumi Bono
The paper introduces a reverse sign language dictionary that recognizes signs from continuous signing without relying on gloss annotations. It does this by captioning sign-level video clips into free-form procedural descriptions using an open-weight vision‑language model, then retrieving the closest description from a multilingual sentence encoder’s vocabulary. Experiments on a Japanese Sign Language corpus show that fine‑tuning the captioner boosts seen‑class retrieval from 4.5% to 49% and improves unseen‑class retrieval from 11.5% to 21%, matching or surpassing traditional closed‑set classifiers where applicable.
SignMatch introduces a prototype‑structured embedding space that learns to match dictionary sign videos with continuous sign language footage based solely on visual similarity of handshape and motion. By mapping isolated dictionary exemplars into this space, the method enables direct, embedding‑based sign matching and can generalise to unseen signs using only dictionary examples. Experiments on ASL‑Citizen, ChaLearn OSLWL, and BOBSL CSLR2 benchmarks show strong cross‑dataset, cross‑task, and cross‑language performance, outperforming prior approaches on American, British, and Spanish sign languages without benchmark‑specific supervision.
By Ryan Wong, Youngjoon Jang, Liliane Momeni, G\"ul Varol, Andrew Zisserman
The paper argues that BLEU-4, the prevailing metric for sign language translation (SLT), may not accurately reflect sign language proficiency because SLT models can exploit spurious correlations and spoken-language priors. By evaluating six SLT models on Phoenix-2014T and CSL-Daily, the authors show that higher BLEU-4 scores do not necessarily indicate better spatio-temporal understanding. They propose a new open-weight LLM QA protocol inspired by language-learning assessment, which better preserves salient content, aligns more closely with human rankings, and reveals differences between gloss-free and gloss-supervised systems that BLEU-4 obscures.
By Oline Ranum, Edward Fish, Simon Hadfield, Richard Bowden
SignSeek is a new method for learning transferable sign representations that enables efficient retrieval of signs from dictionaries using only a query video. It employs contrastive learning with saliency‑guided articulator masking, aligning same‑gloss signs across signers while focusing on the single most critical articulator per sign. Trained on 266K samples from multiple sign languages, SignSeek achieves state‑of‑the‑art cross‑corpus retrieval performance and zero‑shot generalisation to unseen British Sign Language, also improving isolated sign recognition and subtitle alignment.
By Sobhan Asasi, Ozge Mercanoglu Sincan, Richard Bowden
The paper introduces FS23K, a large-scale British Sign Language fingerspelling dataset created through an iterative annotation framework. It also presents a recognition model that incorporates bi‑manual interactions and mouthing cues, achieving a halved character error rate compared to previous state‑of‑the‑art methods. These results underscore the dataset’s and model’s value for advancing sign language research and automated annotation pipelines.
By Alyssa Chan, Taein Kwon, Andrew Zisserman