arXiv AI
Sep 18

For Your Eyes Only: Evaluating Coordination Between Isolated Language Model Instances

For Your Eyes Only: Evaluating Coordination Between Isolated Language Model Instances explores whether a language model can embed a signal in natural language that another independent instance can detect without shared memory or coordination training. The study introduces a cooperative signalling game where a Sender describes two words, one hidden, and a Receiver must identify the target. Seven contemporary models from four architectural families were tested on 300 word pairs, revealing that most struggle to coordinate when signals must be undetectable, though one frontier model performs near-perfectly even after filtering, and that models can also use this capability for deliberate misdirection.

By Alexander Shirnin, Aleksey Kudelya
arXiv AI
Aug 24

Dual-Cache Latent Space Communication between Heterogeneous Language Models

The paper introduces XKV, a latent protocol that enables efficient communication between heterogeneous language models by translating a sharer's key‑value cache into a receiver's context. XKV overcomes limitations of prior methods by jointly pooling both caches, reconciling differing layer depths, and allowing each receiver position to retrieve its own residual in native KV geometry. Across 45 dataset‑model pairings, XKV outperforms previous protocols and text communication while using fewer parameters and achieving faster translation times.

By Jiyao Liu, Qi Zhang, Yaoyi Jia, Ziwen Kan, Song Wang
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 22

ToM2Vec: Continuous Theory-of-Mind Tokens for Multi-Agent Coordination

ToM2Vec introduces continuous theory-of-mind tokens that enable large language model agents to reason about multiple possible partner states in multi‑agent settings. By training these tokens to abstract partner thoughts, the model generates latent representations that condition agents’ thoughts and actions, improving performance across collaborative, competitive, and mixed‑motive environments. The approach demonstrates that latent reasoning outperforms text‑based reasoning and generalizes to unseen partner models, with tokens encoding partner beliefs, desires, and next actions.

By Nithin Sivakumaran, Ali Payani, Hyunji Lee, Mohit Bansal, Elias Stengel-Eskin