arXiv AI
SHAPE of Chain-of-Thought in Math Reasoning
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 3
Geometric Signatures of Reasoning: A Spectral Perspective on Task Hardness
arXiv:2607. 01571v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning enables large language models (LLMs) to solve complex problems by generating intermediate reasoning steps.
arXiv AI
Jun 10
Rotate2Think: Geometric Priming via Orthogonal Rotation to Improve Language Model Reasoning
arXiv:2606. 09873v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reasoning models achieve strong performance on challenging tasks by generating explicit intermediate reasoning traces before producing a final answer.
arXiv AI
4d ago
Construting Reverse Thinking: Developing Large Language Models' Reverse Thingking Ability
arXiv:2609.24760v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When facing complex problems, humans tend to try various ideas for different issues. Human thinking patterns exhibit remarkable flexibility in adapting...
arXiv AI
Jun 8
A Comprehensive Anatomy of Human and DeepSeek-R1 LLM Mathematical Reasoning
arXiv:2606. 07410v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The emergence of "Aha moments" in large language models, particularly DeepSeek-R1-0120, has raised the question of whether these systems genuinely reason or merely imitate the appearance of reasoning.
arXiv AI
Jun 10
RealMath-Eval: Why SOTA Judges Struggle with Real Human Reasoning
arXiv:2606. 10254v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved near-perfect performance in \emph{solving} high-school mathematics, their ability to \emph{evaluate} the diverse reasoning processes of real human students remains under-examined.
arXiv AI
2d ago
LiveMathematicianBench: A Live Benchmark for Research-Level Mathematical Reasoning with Proof Sketches
LiveMathematicianBench is a dynamic multiple‑choice benchmark for research‑level mathematical reasoning, built from recent arXiv papers published after model training cutoffs. It introduces a thirteen‑category logical taxonomy of theorem types and uses a proof‑sketch‑guided distractor pipeline to create plausible but invalid answer choices, enhancing sensitivity to genuine reasoning. Evaluation shows current large language models perform poorly, with the best model scoring 43.5% overall and only 17.6% under substitution‑resistant conditions, indicating the benchmark’s difficulty and realism.