arXiv:2606. 28739v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models increasingly act as agents: they call tools, move money, delete records, and send messages on a user's behalf.
By Shawn Li, Yue Zhao
Mustafa Suleyman argues that artificial models should not be treated as if they possess feelings, preferences, rights, or any entitlement to human welfare. He emphasizes that consciousness underpins our ethical, legal, and political frameworks, and extending such rights to AI would lack evidence and complicate containment and alignment efforts.
The article discusses Bryan Cantrill’s response to a tweet by former Anthropic employee Jacob Coxon, who claimed that AI could kill humanity by the end of the decade. Cantrill shares a personal anecdote about how his own youthful mistakes caused undue panic among non‑technical peers and warns against repeating that pattern. He emphasizes that domain experts must be cautious when making alarmist claims, especially about complex topics like critical infrastructure, bioweapons, and extinction, and that the burden of accurate information lies with those making such statements.
Anthropic has announced that it will donate the Agent Skills standard to the Agentic AI Foundation (AAIF), a Linux Foundation‑backed organization co‑founded with Block and OpenAI. The move follows Anthropic’s earlier declaration that skills would be an open standard and aligns with the AAIF’s recent role as the home of the Model Context Protocol (MCP). The donation is part of Anthropic’s commitment to keeping Agent Skills community‑driven and vendor‑neutral.
arXiv:2610.16946v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Descriptions of how people use AI are becoming training data for the next generation of models. We ask whether what a model reads about its users cha...
By Harsh Kumar, George Eilender, Ashton Anderson
The paper introduces a continued‑pretraining corpus called "coupled welfare" that embeds ecological reasoning into large language models. After a single QLoRA run, the corpus was applied to five open models across three architectures, resulting in a dramatic reduction of harmful decisions under high‑pressure scenarios while leaving general performance unchanged. The study also demonstrates that the improvement is content‑specific, as a neutral control corpus did not yield similar gains, and that the models remain robust against adversarial attempts to justify environmentally destructive actions.
By Trent R. Northen, Mingxun Wang