arXiv AI By Sarah Jabbour, David Fouhey, Nikola Banovic, Stephanie D. Shepard, Ella Kazerooni, Michael W. Sjoding, Jenna Wiens

Selective Prediction Reduces the Negative Effects of Automation Bias Overall but Increases False Negatives

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2508. 07617v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: AI has the potential to augment human decision making.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 7

Clinician input steers AI toward accurate and harmful recommendations

arXiv:2603. 14158v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are entering clinical workflows, yet evaluations rarely assess how clinician reasoning shapes model behavior during clinical interactions.

By Ivan Lopez, Selin S. Everett, Bryan J. Bunning, April S. Liang, Dong Han Yao, Shivam C. Vedak, Kameron C. Black, Sophie Ostmeier, Stephen P. Ma, Emily Alsentzer, Jonathan H. Chen, Akshay S. Chaudhari, Eric Horvitz
arXiv AI
Jul 15

First, do NOHARM: a medical safety benchmark and randomized study of physician and AI teaming on clinical consultations

arXiv:2512. 01241v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) and medical AI tools are routinely used by physicians and patients for medical advice, yet their clinical safety profiles remain poorly characterized.

By David Wu, Fateme Nateghi Haredasht, Saloni Kumar Maharaj, Priyank Jain, Jessica Tran, Matthew Gwiazdon, Arjun Rustagi, Jenelle Jindal, Jacob M. Koshy, Vinay Kadiyala, Anup Agarwal, Bassman Tappuni, Brianna French, Sirus Jesudasen, Christopher V. Cosgriff, Rebanta Chakraborty, Jillian Caldwell, Susan Ziolkowski, David J. Iberri, Robert Diep, Rahul S. Dalal, Kira L. Newman, Kristin Galetta, J. Carl Pallais, Nancy Wei, Kathleen M. Buchheit, David I. Hong, Vartan Pahalyants, Ernest Y. Lee, Allen Shih, Tamara B. Kaplan, Vishnu Ravi, Sarita Khemani, Thomas A. Buckley, April S. Liang, Daniel Shirvani, Advait Patil, Nicholas Marshall, Kanav Chopra, Joel Koh, Adi Badhwar, Anastasia Perez, Austin J. Schoeffler, Mahbuba Tusty, Chase M. Walton, Liam G. McCoy, David J. H. Wu, Yingjie Weng, Sumant Ranji, Kevin Schulman, Nigam H. Shah, Jason Hom, Arnold Milstein, Arjun K. Manrai, Adam Rodman, Jonathan H. Chen, Ethan Goh
arXiv AI
Sep 3

Examining the Vulnerability of Multi-Agent Medical Systems to Human Interventions for Clinical Reasoning

The paper investigates how human interventions at specific fault points—moments when an AI agent’s reasoning is most vulnerable—affect the diagnostic accuracy of multi‑agent medical systems. Using the MedQA dataset, the authors found that correct interventions can boost baseline accuracy by up to 40%, whereas incorrect or bias‑related interventions can reduce performance by up to 6% and increase diagnostic drift and uncertainty. The study also highlights behavioral parallels between cognitive biases observed in simulated agent conversations and real‑world clinical practice, such as premature closure and susceptibility to misleading cues.

By Benjamin C Liu, Dillon Mehta, Rishi Malhotra, Adam Zobian, Yong Ying Tan, Samir Chopra, Daniella Rand, Natalie Pang, Abhiram Gudimella, Kevin Zhu
arXiv AI
Jul 20

Perception-Aligned AI Outputs: End-to-End Visual Prediction for Uncertainty Communication in Clinical Decision-Making

arXiv:2205. 04599v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is essential for trustworthy AI in healthcare, yet many existing methods rely on technical explanations that are difficult for clinicians and patients to interpret.

By Mohammad Eslami, Solale Tabarestani, Saber Kazeminasab, Ehsan Adeli, Glyn Elwyn, Tobias Elze, Mengyu Wang, Nazlee Zebardast, Lucia Sobrin, Nassir Navab, Daniel Shu Wei Ting, Malek Adjouadi