arXiv AI
Secret Stealing Attacks on Local LLM Fine-Tuning through Supply-Chain Model Code Backdoors
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 17
Loss Landscape Poisoning: Targeted Extraction of Unseen Training Data from LLMs
arXiv:2606. 17110v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models are increasingly trained on proprietary or sensitive data, from private healthcare and financial records to user conversations containing secrets.
arXiv AI
Jun 16
Cordyceps: Covert Control Attacks on LLMs via Data Poisoning
arXiv:2605. 26595v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are often fine-tuned on uncurated text datasets that adversaries can poison.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 30
FlipGuard: Defending Large Language Models Against Quantization-Conditioned Backdoor Attacks
arXiv:2606. 28962v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Model quantization is essential for the efficient deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs), but introduces a critical vulnerability: Quantization-Conditioned Backdoor (QCB) attacks.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 22
Defense Against LLM Backdoors using Critical Neuron Isolation Pruning
Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where hidden triggers induce malicious outputs. Existing defenses generally fall into inference-time detection or training-time mitigation, but face two key limitations.
arXiv AI
Jul 23
Defense Against LLM Backdoors using Critical Neuron Isolation Pruning
arXiv:2607. 19894v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where hidden triggers induce malicious outputs.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 19
FloatDoor: Platform-Triggered Backdoors in LLMs
arXiv:2606. 19535v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in sensitive settings such as software engineering, where their outputs directly shape downstream artifacts.