arXiv Machine Learning By Rickard Br\"uel Gabrielsson

Scaling Laws for Behavioral Foundation Models over User Event Sequences

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2606. 05257v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Foundation models are increasingly trained on sequences of user actions in recommendation, payments, fraud, and commerce, but these models still lack the kind of compute calibration that scaling laws provide for language models.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv AI
Jun 9

Item Response Scaling Laws: A Measurement Theory Approach for Efficient and Generalizable Neural Scaling Estimation

arXiv:2606. 07616v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Scaling laws provide a fundamental framework for understanding the performance of Language Models (LMs), yet deriving them requires prohibitively expensive evaluations across thousands of checkpoints or millions of inference samples.

By Sang Truong, Yuheng Tu, Rylan Schaeffer, Sanmi Koyejo
arXiv AI
Sep 4

Learning What Not to Forget: Long-Horizon Agent Memory from a Few Kilobytes of Learning

The paper introduces LRE (Learned Relevance Eviction), a lightweight, CPU‑only, language‑model‑free scorer that learns which parts of an agent’s interaction history are task‑critical and preserves them verbatim. In experiments, LRE matches or surpasses baseline eviction policies on accuracy‑cost trade‑offs, recovers 93% of full‑history accuracy, reduces worst‑case prompt size by 52%, and outperforms dense and token‑pruning encoders in conversational memory while being 295–1569× smaller. The method also achieves superior budgeted answer quality on LoCoMo reading and can be trained annotation‑free, recovering 95% of supervised scorer performance.

By Nusrat Jahan Lia, Aritra Mazumder
arXiv AI
Jul 29

Bridging Compute- and Data-Optimal Pretraining

arXiv:2607. 25271v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Classical compute-optimal scaling laws assume an unbounded supply of fresh pretraining data, yet pretraining is increasingly entering a regime in which compute grows faster than the availability of high-quality data.

By Tian Qin, Kimia Hamidieh, David Alvarez-Melis
arXiv AI
3d ago

Revisiting scaling laws for reward optimization

The paper presents a new scaling law for reward optimization in AI alignment, showing that performance scales as Θ(√min{log(M), K}), where M is the number of preference comparisons used to train a proxy reward model and K is the KL‑divergence budget relative to a reference policy. The authors derive this law using an information‑theoretic model, prove its tightness, and validate it with extensive experiments involving a 70B gold reward model and smaller proxy models (0.6B–4B). The empirical results demonstrate a strong fit (R² 97–99 %) across different model sizes, noise levels, and optimization methods, suggesting that reward optimization behaves like a simple selection task over IID Gaussian variables with noisy feedback.

By Ali Aouad, Aymane El Gadarri, Vivek F. Farias
arXiv AI
Aug 25

Towards a Densing Law for User Representation Learning at Billion-Scale Capacity

The paper introduces a User Behavioral Densing Law that quantifies how the minimum sufficient tokenization capacity scales with data size in user representation learning. A pilot study on a billion‑scale Alipay dataset shows raw data scaling bottlenecks and the benefits of tokenization, while theoretical analysis and experiments reveal an approximately linear relationship between the logarithms of tokenization capacity and input data size. Using this law, the authors develop ALGN, an adaptive variable‑length tokenization method that outperforms existing baselines across diverse data sources and downstream tasks.

By Bin Dou, Junru Zhang, Zhaoyi Yuan, Wuliang Huang, Letian Gong, Baokun Wang, Huan Li, Yu Cheng, Weiqiang Wang