arXiv AI By Lifan Mei, Yuxuan Li, Jiaxian Tu, Shenghe Xu

SatOps-Decision: Low-Latency Discriminative Decisions for Onboard Satellite Communication Operations

Read the original on arXiv AI →

SatOps-Decision is a low‑latency decision‑making method for satellite communication operations that uses a locally adapted Laya encoder with a native decision head to select operational answers in a single forward pass. It is the first application of Jev‑style discriminative decision models to satellite operations, and its accompanying benchmark is the first dedicated to this approach, featuring authored operational contracts, controlled state changes, and independently checked labels. In evaluations, SatOps-Decision achieves a median latency of 90.3 ms per decision and a mean raw accuracy of 85.3 %, outperforming baseline models such as Qwen3.5‑0.8B and OneJev1.6‑0.8B.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 23

Joint or Per-Option? Compact Encoders for Closed-Set Decisions from 17 Million to 1 Billion Parameters

The paper investigates how compact an encoder can be for closed‑set decision tasks in language‑model pipelines, comparing joint versus per‑option scoring. In a 32‑million‑parameter study, per‑option scoring outperforms joint scoring by 5.8 chance‑corrected skill points on a 37‑benchmark suite, and two external benchmarks corroborate this advantage. Across six released joint encoders ranging from 17 million to 1 billion parameters, the 68‑ and 150‑million‑parameter models surpass a 435‑million‑parameter DeBERTa‑v3 zero‑shot classifier on 209 overlapping tasks and match it on 145 unseen tasks, while the smallest model processes a median request in 14 ms versus 728 ms for the classifier.

By Tardelli Ronan Coelho Stekel
arXiv AI
Sep 17

The Inference Engineering Pareto Atlas: Which Optimizations Dominate the Cost, Quality, and Latency Frontier?

The paper presents a Pareto atlas of LLM inference optimizations, mapping cost, quality, and latency trade‑offs for Qwen2.5‑7B‑Instruct on L4, A100, and H100 GPUs. Using 54 measured configurations and a calibrated simulator, it identifies 18 of 36 setups on the Pareto frontier, showing that combined methods outperform single ones. Quality tests reveal that AWQ 4bit and FP8 weights offer significant latency reductions while largely preserving accuracy, but naive FP8 KV caching fails to answer any questions correctly.

By Srikanta Datta Tumkur, Jay Iyer, Mehar Simhadri, Sai Pavan Kumar, Sai Kapil Kumar, Ramesh Nampelly
arXiv AI
Oct 31

ThinkJev: One Thought, Every Budget for Calibrated Typed Decisions

ThinkJev introduces a hybrid approach that lets a language model decide whether to answer directly or to think first, using the same underlying model for both fast and slow responses. By reading the model’s probability distribution over option letters after any number of thought tokens, the system can provide a calibrated decision under any thinking budget without retraining. Experiments with Qwen3.5-27B show that the method achieves high accuracy while reducing the number of thought tokens needed, and it performs competitively on the JevBench benchmark.

By Xiaolu Ding, Kai Yang, Dongdong Liu
arXiv AI
Oct 16

Verdict: Encode Once, Decide Many

Verdict-MQ is an open encoder that processes a single piece of state once and then answers multiple typed questions about that state, avoiding separate passes for each question. By using a structured attention mask, it ensures the state encoding is independent of question order and prevents questions from influencing one another. On the typed‑decisions benchmark, Verdict‑MQ outperforms a larger specialist model, achieving higher accuracy and better calibration, while on other benchmarks it shows mixed results compared to fine‑tuned baselines.

By Avdhesh Singh Chouhan, Jack Perry