arXiv Machine Learning By Liang Yue, Eric A. Vance

Same Layout, Different Count: What Number Words Do Past Ten in Text-to-Image Models

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The study investigates how text-to-image models interpret number words beyond ten objects. By keeping the object type and initial noise constant, researchers varied the requested count and observed that models reliably follow the number only up to about ten items; beyond that, the count influence weakens and the image composition is largely governed by the coarse noise. Models such as SD3.5‑Medium and FLUX.1‑dev lose adherence after ten, while FLUX.2 and Qwen‑Image loosely track counts up to twenty‑five, yet no clear directional effect is achieved beyond the models’ limits.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 28

3, 7, 14, 17, 42: Instruction Tuning Installs and Sharpens Number-Choice Heuristics in Language Models

The study measures the exact probability that language models assign to each integer from 1 to N when prompted for a random number, eliminating sampling noise by summing over all spellings. Across 18 open‑weight models and 29 decoding settings, instruction tuning consistently makes the distribution less uniform, introducing a round‑number avoidance heuristic and sharpening endpoint avoidance. While tuned models rarely output the extreme values 1 or N and largely avoid multiples of 10, they do not converge on a single favorite integer across models.

By Samar Ansari
arXiv AI
Sep 24

What Looks Like a Capability Limit in Vision-Language Models Is a Readout Limit

The paper argues that apparent capability limits in vision‑language benchmarks often stem from the way answers are presented rather than from the models themselves. By comparing performance on COCO images with answer choices given as English names versus pixel coordinates, the authors show that models like Qwen3‑VL‑4B perform far better when answers are in natural language, and that the choice of answer format can swing model rankings by dozens of points. The study also demonstrates that different conventions (e.g., hue angles vs. pixel coordinates) reveal which formats a model can actually interpret, highlighting that a fixed answer vocabulary is not neutral across models.

By Alfredo F. Frontera Del Valle
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 9

It's Always 10:10: Reference Images Break a Bias That Prompts Only Dent

The study investigates a bias in text‑to‑image models that consistently generate analog clocks showing 10:10, a common advertising pose. Researchers tested 52 models on images requiring clocks to display 2:35, 6:50, and 11:20, varying the prompt to include no time, digits, hand positions in words, or a drawn reference dial. Results show that adding a reference dial dramatically improves accuracy (up to 75% correct) while other prompt variations only modestly reduce the 10:10 bias.

By Luca Cazzaniga