Hugging Face Blog
SAIR: Accelerating Pharma R&D with AI-Powered Structural Intelligence
Read the original on Hugging Face Blog →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Blog.
Related stories
OpenAI Blog
Jun 17
A near-autonomous AI chemist improves a challenging reaction in medicinal chemistry
OpenAI and Molecule. one show how a near-autonomous AI chemist using GPT-5.
MIT News AI
May 20
Building AI models that understand chemical principles
Connor Coley works at the interface of chemistry and machine learning, to discover and design new drug compounds.
arXiv AI
Jun 18
TxBench-PP: Analyzing AI Agent Performance on Small-Molecule Preclinical Pharmacology
arXiv:2606. 19245v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) agents promise to accelerate drug discovery by compressing interpretation and decision-making loops, but practical deployment requires trusted evaluation on realistic program decisions.
arXiv AI
Aug 25
RetroDFM-R: Reasoning-Driven Retrosynthesis Prediction with Large Language Models via Reinforcement Learning
arXiv:2507.17448v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Retrosynthetic planning is a cornerstone of organic synthesis and drug discovery. Yet existing AI methods often rely on pattern matching rath...
arXiv AI
Jun 30
Accelerating scientific discovery with Co-Scientist
arXiv:2502. 18864v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scientific discovery is driven by scientists generating novel hypotheses for complex problems that undergo rigorous experimental validation.
arXiv AI
1d ago
R-GroundBench: A Diagnostic Benchmark for R-Group Groundingin Markush Molecular Editing
R-GroundBench is a new diagnostic benchmark for evaluating AI models on R‑group grounding in Markush molecular editing, derived from real pharmaceutical patents. It includes a Multiple‑Choice VQA track with varying difficulty and modality splits, as well as an open‑ended Generation track. Experiments show a large performance gap: models score over 90% on easy VQA but drop to 56–66% on hard VQA, and generation exact match stays below 20% (and under 8% with visual input).