arXiv Machine Learning By Chaeeun Han, Soodeh Atefi, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik, Aron Laszka

SAGE: Similarity-Based Cleaning of Poisoned Training Data from Verified Examples

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

SAGE is a defense against clean‑label data poisoning that relies on a very small set of verified examples—both clean and poisoned—rather than a large clean set. It trains a generic feature extractor on a separate dataset and then uses a non‑parametric, similarity‑weighted prediction to flag poisoned training examples. Experiments on standard benchmarks show that even a handful of verified poisoned examples give a substantial advantage, and that the distribution of verified clean examples across classes is more important than their sheer number.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

Are Targeted Data Poisoning Attacks as Effective as We Think?

arXiv:2509.06896v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Targeted data poisoning attacks manipulate model predictions on specific test samples by injecting malicious data into training. Yet existing evalu...

By William Xu, Chenyu Zhang, Yihan Wang, Matthew Y. R. Yang, Zuoqiu Liu, Yaoliang Yu, Gautam Kamath, Yiwei Lu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 7

Two Sides of the Same Coin: Learning the Backdoor to Remove the Backdoor

The community has recently developed various training-time defenses to counter neural backdoors introduced through data poisoning. In light of the observation that a model learns poisonous samples responsible for the backdoor easier than benign samples, these approaches either use a fixed threshold of the training loss for splitting or iteratively learn a reference model as an oracle for identifying benign samples.