arXiv AI By Piotr Jedryszek, Oliver M. Crook

Retrieval and competition: how a protein foundation model starts a protein

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2605. 16331v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Protein language models are increasingly used to guide experimental and clinical decisions, yet it is often unclear whether a confident prediction reflects recognition of biological evidence or retrieval of a statistical default.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28

Interpreting Latent Protein Language Model Features with Geometric Annotations

The paper introduces a scalable method to interpret sparse autoencoder (SAE) features in the ESM-2 protein language model by leveraging geometrically inspired features of the protein α‑carbon backbone. Across 8M layers of ESM-2, a false discovery rate–controlled analysis shows that local geometry is significantly associated with many SAE features, revealing substructure within known biological labels and enabling annotation of unannotated metagenomic proteins. Ablation experiments demonstrate that removing these geometric features shifts ESM-2’s predicted contact maps toward the descriptor, linking mechanistic interpretability with structural biology.

By Siddharth Setlur, Djordje Mihajlovic, Darrick Lee
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

MT-ProtBERT: Multi-task Learning ProtBERT for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Classification with Scarce Data

MT-ProtBERT is a multi‑task extension of ProtBERT designed for classifying intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) in low‑data settings. It combines Dynamic Window Masking, a Multi‑Scale 1D Convolutional classifier, and auxiliary biochemistry‑informed objectives to jointly optimize masked language modeling and domain‑specific tasks. In experiments on phosphorylation site prediction and protein compaction prediction, MT‑ProtBERT outperforms the RNN‑based IDP model PARROT across all limited‑data tasks.

By Jian Sun, Kingshuk Ghosh, Lilianna Houston, Mohammad H. Mahoor
arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

When Do Biological Reasoning Models Use Their Biological Inputs?

The study evaluates whether biological reasoning models actually use their biological inputs by testing six models on DNA, protein, and single‑cell tasks. By perturbing one biological input while keeping others fixed, the authors find that many models (e.g., Evo2, ESM3, BioReason, BioReason‑Pro) rely primarily on textual information, with minimal impact from the biological representations. In contrast, models like ChatNT, Prot2Text‑V2, CellWhisperer, and Cell2Sentence‑Scale show greater dependence on their biological inputs, yet overall accuracy gains do not consistently reflect increased biological input contribution.

By Ada Fang, Nikitha Thoduguli, Lukas Fesser, Hanlin Zhang, Sham M. Kakade, Marinka Zitnik
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 18

Contextualizing Biological Language Models across Modalities via Logit-Space Contrastive Alignment

arXiv:2606. 18703v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pretrained biological language models expose per-token probability distributions through masked-token prediction, providing the likelihood interface central to sequence design, variant scoring, and mechanistic interpretation.

By Yanjun Shao, Yundi Chen, Yashvi Patel, Aurelien Pelissier, Mar\'ia Rodr\'iguez Mart\'inez
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 20

Off-Manifold Collapse in Guided Protein Language Models

The paper investigates a problem in guided protein language models where strong guidance causes the model’s internal representations to collapse onto a region indistinguishable from random amino‑acid input, leading to low‑complexity sequences that still score well on the targeted property. The authors identify this off‑manifold collapse as a detectable signature and propose a post‑hoc filtering technique—Mahalanobis filtering—that removes atypical candidates based on a density prior over natural activations. This simple, training‑free step improves both property scores and structural plausibility across different guidance methods without altering the generator.

By Shuibai Zhang, Xinchi Liu, Fred Zhangzhi Peng, Zhihan Yang, Shutong Wu, Yingzi Ma, Jiawei Zhang