arXiv AI By Keren Artiaga, Sabyasachi Kamila, Haithem Afli, Conor Lynch, Mohammed Hasanuzzaman

Rethinking Sign Language Translation: The Impact of Signer Dependence on Model Evaluation

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 9

SignRAG: Unified Retrieval-Augmented Gloss-Free Sign Language Translation

SignRAG is a unified framework for gloss‑free sign language translation that combines hierarchical pretraining, target‑domain retrieval augmentation, and retrieval‑aware reinforcement fine‑tuning. It first learns linguistically grounded sign representations, aligns a sign encoder with a decoder‑only large language model, and then uses a retrieval gallery to provide instance‑specific translation cues. Retrieval Utility‑Guided Reinforcement Fine‑Tuning (RUG‑RFT) balances translation quality and retrieval usefulness, leading to state‑of‑the‑art results, including the first gloss‑free approach to outperform gloss‑supervised methods on CSL‑Daily.

By Zhi Rao, Yucheng Zhou, Qianran Sun, Yiqing Huang, Longcan Yuan, Jiayi Hou, Chengwen Yao, Lin Cheng, Donghui Sun, Xiaoxin Chen, Jun Wan
arXiv AI
Jun 19

Target-Side Paraphrase Augmentation for Sign Language Translation with Large Language Models

arXiv:2605. 31393v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Sign language translation (SLT) remains constrained by the limited availability of paired sign-video/text corpora and by the heavy-tailed vocabularies typical of real-world datasets.

By Pedro Dal Bianco, Jean Paul Nunes Reinhold, Oscar Stanchi, Facundo Quiroga, Franco Ronchetti, Ulisses Brisolara Corr\^ea
arXiv AI
Sep 4

Beyond BLEU: A Case for Redefining Sign Language Translation Benchmarks

The paper argues that BLEU-4, the prevailing metric for sign language translation (SLT), may not accurately reflect sign language proficiency because SLT models can exploit spurious correlations and spoken-language priors. By evaluating six SLT models on Phoenix-2014T and CSL-Daily, the authors show that higher BLEU-4 scores do not necessarily indicate better spatio-temporal understanding. They propose a new open-weight LLM QA protocol inspired by language-learning assessment, which better preserves salient content, aligns more closely with human rankings, and reveals differences between gloss-free and gloss-supervised systems that BLEU-4 obscures.

By Oline Ranum, Edward Fish, Simon Hadfield, Richard Bowden
arXiv AI
Aug 11

Bridging the Gap Between Semantics and Reconstruction:Unifying Sign Language Translation and Production

arXiv:2608. 09045v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in sign language (SL) research have shown a trend toward unifying multiple sign language understanding (SLU) subtasks, such as isolated sign language recognition (ISLR), continuous sign language recognition (CSLR), and sign language translation (SLT), within a single framework, leading to substantial progress.

By Xiao Liu, Shiwei Gan, Yafeng Yin, Jiaxin Yin, Bowen Guo, Yaqi Sun, Zhiwei Jiang, Lei Xie
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 5

M-GATE: Multilingual Grammar, Accuracy in Translation, and Efficiency Benchmark for Large Language Models

arXiv:2608. 03803v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multilingual language models are deployed across a hundred or more languages, yet most benchmarks test whether a model can perform a task _in_ a language rather than whether it commands the language itself, conflating fluency with proficiency.

By Tom\'a\v{s} Burkert, Angelika Peljak-{\L}api\'nska, David Zelen\'y