arXiv Computation and Language
Rethinking Pivot Programming Languages in Code Language Models
Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Computation and Language.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Aug 26
Evaluating Language Models on Cross-Language Code Functional Equivalence
The paper introduces PolyHuman, a dataset of human-written programs in C++, Java, and Python, to test whether large language models can judge functional equivalence across languages. Using this dataset, the authors evaluate several open-weight and proprietary LLMs, finding that models struggle more with harder problems, show language-specific biases, and rely partly on superficial similarity cues. They also observe run‑to‑run instability in GPT‑o4‑mini, concluding that current LLMs do not reliably capture functional equivalence within or across programming languages.
arXiv AI
Jul 17
Large Language Models for Code Generation from Multilingual Prompts: A Curated Benchmark and a Study on Code Quality
arXiv:2607. 14816v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) perform differently on identical programming tasks when prompted in different natural languages, a phenomenon known as language bias.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 16
Large Language Models for Code Generation from Multilingual Prompts: A Curated Benchmark and a Study on Code Quality
Large Language Models (LLMs) perform differently on identical programming tasks when prompted in different natural languages, a phenomenon known as language bias. While this behavior has been widely studied for general text generation, its impact on code generation quality and programming conventions remains largely unexplored.
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 11
Themis: Training Robust Multilingual Code Reward Models for Flexible Multi-Criteria Scoring
arXiv:2605. 00754v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reward models (RMs) have become an indispensable fixture of the language model (LM) post-training playbook, enabling policy alignment and test-time scaling.
arXiv AI
Jul 16
The Hitchhiker's Guide to Monoculture
arXiv:2607. 13077v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) often produce homogeneous outputs, raising concerns that AI coding assistants may lead to convergence in the software artifacts that developers create.
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 22
The Best Programming Language for Tokenmaxxing: An Investigation of Coding Agent Behavior Across Programming Languages
The paper investigates how token consumption varies across programming languages for coding agents. Five recent models were evaluated on Python, Java, Rust, and OCaml, revealing significant differences in token usage that persist across models. Analysis of agent trajectories shows that agents often generate non‑compiling solutions in unfamiliar languages, revise passing solutions, plan in code comments, distrust provided tests, and prototype in Python to sidestep unfamiliar languages.