arXiv:2607. 06344v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While personalisation is becoming a defining capability in human-robot interaction (HRI), the existing literature on responsible personalisation remains fragmented, offering isolated accounts of ethical risks without a structured understanding of how they emerge across interaction contexts.
By Antonio Andriella, Jauwairia Nasir, Andrea Rezzani, Alyssa Kubota, Dimitri Lacroix, Tamlin Love, Aniol Civit, Vicky Charisi, Elisabeth Andre, Wing-Yue Geoffrey Louie
The paper "Why did My Robot Just Change Personality? Prompting Guidelines for a Grounded Robot Persona in LLM-Based HRI" addresses the lack of clear prompt design in human‑robot interaction using large language models. It proposes a framework and a structured prompt template with eight functional components to specify, bound, and adapt robot behavior. The authors base their guidelines on a review of prior work and on survey data from 27 HRI experts, highlighting issues such as unclear robot personality, the need for user adaptation, and ethical concerns around safety, deception, and governance.
By Ashita Ashok, Franziska Babel, Patrick Holthaus, Rucha Khot, Karla Bransky, Fethiye Irmak Dogan, Karsten Berns, Silvia Rossi, Minha Lee, Guy Laban
arXiv:2606. 09038v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled increasingly personalized interactions by adapting to users' preferences, contexts, and long-term histories.
By Yanyan Luo, Xue Han, Ruiqiao Bai, Xin Huang, Yitong Wang, Qian Hu, Qing Wang, Chunxu Zhao, Jie Liu, Cong Geng, Lehao Xing, Pengwei Hu, Junlan Feng
arXiv:2608. 14692v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Personalized, generative AI systems increasingly adapt their behavior to individual users over time, fundamentally changing model behavior.
By Hannah Cha
arXiv:2606. 03312v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While household robots are often evaluated based on task completion, everyday domestic environments involve value-conflicting situations in which robots are expected to choose actions that prioritize other values than task success, such as human autonomy, efficiency, or social appropriateness.
By Jongwook Han, Hyeongjin Kim, Yohan Jo
The paper introduces Safety Nudges, a browser-based tool that displays lightweight, in situ flags when a conversational AI exhibits risky behavior such as hallucination or overconfidence. In a two‑week field study with 45 frequent chatbot users, participants reported that the nudges were useful, clear, and minimally disruptive, and most felt more aware of potential AI harms. However, increased awareness did not automatically translate into measurable changes in user behavior, underscoring the need for relevance, calibration, and user control in nudge design.
By Varshini Elangovan, James Wedgwood, Chhavi Yadav, William Agnew, Sauvik Das, Virginia Smith