arXiv AI By Xue Hu, Zewei Pan, Zhongyuan Wang, Zhou Liu, Zeli Su, Wentao Zhang

ReproAgent: Contract-Guided Paper-to-Code Reproduction

Read the original on arXiv AI →

ReproAgent is a four‑stage pipeline—Prepare, Plan, Generate, Repair—that uses a persistent implementation contract to guide scientific AI agents in converting research papers into executable code repositories. The system employs two channels: an implementation‑requirement channel that translates paper snippets into code obligations, and a reference‑evidence channel that pulls content and structure from related repositories. Evaluated on PaperBench Code‑Dev, ReproAgent achieves the highest mean score among same‑backbone scaffolds for both Claude‑Sonnet‑4.5 and Gemini‑3‑Flash, with ablation studies confirming the contribution of both channels.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Sep 2

PaperCompiler: Faithful Paper-to-Code Generation via Repository-Level Specification Compilation

PaperCompiler is a framework that translates research papers into repository-level code by compiling paper-grounded evidence into explicit implementation specifications. It preserves source provenance, distinguishes between paper-supported, inferred, externally delegated, and unresolved information, and encodes non-degradation requirements, ownership, cross-file dependencies, and file-level constraints. The approach outperforms baselines on Paper2CodeBench, improving reference-based fidelity by 13.8% and halving high-severity evaluator critiques.

arXiv AI
Sep 3

PaperCompiler: Faithful Paper-to-Code Generation via Repository-Level Specification Compilation

PaperCompiler is a framework that translates research papers into repository-level code by compiling paper-grounded evidence into explicit implementation specifications. It preserves source provenance, distinguishes between paper-supported, inferred, externally delegated, and unresolved information, and encodes requirements such as non-degradation, ownership, cross-file dependencies, and file-level constraints. The framework improves reference-based fidelity by 13.8% and cuts high-severity evaluator critiques from 13.2% to 6.1% on Paper2CodeBench.

By Yunhao Liu, Hong Phuc Pham, Jaehong Yoon
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 20

SWE-bench Science: Can Coding Agents Resolve Engineering Tasks in Science?

SWE‑bench Science is a benchmark for evaluating coding agents on scientific software engineering tasks, comprising 119 tasks from 98 GitHub repositories across 20 scientific domains. The tasks are grouped into Issue‑driven, Expert‑exploratory, and Engineering‑integration paradigms, and even the best agent, Claude Code with Opus‑5 (max), achieves a pass@1 below 50%. The study identifies four common failure mechanisms—lack of scientific knowledge, misguided exploration, incomplete repair coverage, and poor generalization—and shows that providing scientific guidance can both help and hinder repair depending on its alignment with the task.

arXiv AI
Aug 11

A Unified Issue Resolution Benchmark for Requirement Clarification, Planning, and Code Generation for Coding Agents

arXiv:2608. 09072v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model-powered coding agents are increasingly used to modify existing code repositories, for example, by adding features or fixing bugs.

By Xin Zhou, Chun Yong Chong, Kisub Kim, Yun Peng, Rui Shu, Zihan Wu, Xu Han, Guowen Yuan, Zeyang Zhuang, Jounghoon Kim, Jeongjin Ju, Seongmin Ju, Taein Yoon, David Lo