arXiv:2608. 25221v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study exact representations of $\mathrm{MAX}_N(x)=\max{x_1,\ldots,x_N}$ using two-hidden-layer ReLU neural networks.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.
arXiv:2607. 21651v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We prove that the maximum of $n$ real numbers is exactly representable by a ReLU network with two hidden layers for every $n\le 10$.
arXiv:2608.24865v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Lipschitz constants are a standard way to quantify the sensitivity of neural networks to small input perturbations, but computing them is difficult e...
arXiv:2607. 07778v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Bubeck, Li and Nagaraj conjectured that, for generic data, any two-layer neural network with $m$ neurons that fits $n$ noisy labels must have Lipschitz constant at least of order $\sqrt{n/m}$, with no restriction on the size of the weights.
arXiv:2608.23877v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We prove a depth hierarchy for ReLU neural networks in which every additional ReLU layer can save exponentially many neurons. For every $\ell\geq 3$, a...
arXiv:2607. 04597v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this paper, we study the universal approximation property of residual neural networks, and obtain some new results.
The paper proves that several decision and approximation problems for ReLU neural networks are computationally hard. For any number of layers λ≥2, deciding whether a network’s output is positive (and thus whether it is surjective) is W[ℓ−1]-hard when parameterized by the input dimension d. In particular, for two-layer networks, the related geometric problem of zonotope non‑containment is W[1]-hard in the ambient dimension, and computing or approximating the Lp‑Lipschitz constant is NP‑hard and W[ℓ−1]-hard with respect to d. The results also show that these problems remain hard when parameterized by the number of layers for constant d, implying that naive enumeration algorithms running in n^{(ℓ−1)d}·poly(N) time are essentially optimal under the Exponential Time Hypothesis.