arXiv AI By Shuimu Chen, Yuteng Chen, Yuanshen Guan, Zebang Cheng, Zeyu Zhang, Shengqian Qin, Bin Xia, Jiaran Li, Wenming Yang, Fei Ma

Reflect-R1: Evidence-Driven Reflection for Self-Correction in Long Video Understanding

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 27922v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current multimodal reflection mechanisms for long video understanding predominantly rely on closed-loop self-reflection within internal parameters.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 21

Video Evidence to Reasoning Efficient Video Understanding via Explicit Evidence Grounding

arXiv:2601. 07761v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) face a fundamental dilemma in video reasoning: they are caught between the prohibitive computational costs of verbose reasoning and the hallucination risks of efficient, ungrounded approaches.

By Yanxiang Huang, Guohua Gao, Zhaoyang Wei
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 10

VideoTIR: Accurate Understanding for Long Videos with Efficient Tool-Integrated Reasoning

VideoTIR introduces a reinforcement‑learning approach to improve long‑video understanding by encouraging multimodal large language models to use comprehensive multi‑level toolkits efficiently. It combines Zero‑RL and SFT cold‑starting strategies to help models retrieve and focus on meaningful video segments, images, and regions, thereby reducing hallucinations. The method includes Toolkit Action Grouped Policy Optimization (TAGPO) to streamline tool‑calling and a sandbox‑based trajectory synthesis framework for high‑quality data, achieving strong results on three long‑video QA benchmarks.

By Zhe Gao, Shiyu Shen, Taifeng Chai, Weinong Wang, Haotian Xu, Xing Wu, Wenbin Li, Qi Fan, Yang Gao, Dacheng Tao
arXiv AI
Aug 21

VISD: Enhancing Video Reasoning via Structured Self-Distillation

arXiv:2605. 06094v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Training VideoLLMs for complex reasoning remains challenging due to sparse sequence level rewards and the lack of fine grained credit assignment over long, temporally grounded reasoning trajectories.

By Hao Lin, Kunyang Lv, Xu Jiang, Jingqi Tian, Zhongjing Du, Jiayu Ding, Qiaoman Zhang, Hongbo Jin