arXiv:2609.23836v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: A fundamentally challenging question in K-12 education is about the effects of taking more advanced or challenging classes. It is particularly complex...
By Nabit Bajwa, Seth B. Hunter, Sanmay Das
arXiv:2609.24556v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) minimises aggregate reconstruction error, which can inadvertently represent majority subgroups with substantially...
By Arjun KM, Shashi Jain
arXiv:2606. 20461v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine learning models have been shown to exhibit discriminatory outcomes or degraded performance for individuals at the intersection of multiple sensitive attributes, such as race and gender.
By Bruno Scarone, Alfredo Viola, Ren\'ee J. Miller
arXiv:2603. 04689v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Fair top-$k$ selection, which ensures appropriate proportional representation of members from minority or historically disadvantaged groups among the top-$k$ selected candidates, has drawn significant attention.
By Guangya Cai
arXiv:2609.38552v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Public institutions increasingly procure AI systems whose design they cannot inspect or change. In higher education, proprietary Early Warning System...
By Kelly McConvey, Angelina Zhai, Rebecca Li, Shion Guha
The paper argues that traditional probabilistic fairness metrics can miss significant disparities in the actual consequences of decisions. By introducing a utility-based framework, the authors show that a process can satisfy ε-fairness yet still be maximally unfair when utilities are considered. They apply this framework to college admissions and credit‑risk assessment, demonstrating that equalizing probabilities alone may mask unequal utility outcomes across groups.
By Tolulope Fadina, Thorsten Schmidt