arXiv AI By Hiroaki Hayashi, Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Prafulla Kumar Choubey, Chien-Sheng Wu

Redesigning and Auditing Deep Research Writing for Faithful Reports

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces CLAIMPROBE, a claim-level audit tool that breaks down deep-research reports into individual claims and evaluates them for hallucination, misattribution, citation hygiene, and necessary-fact recall against retrieved evidence. Using CLAIMPROBE, the authors show that even high-scoring deep-research pipelines can omit key evidence and misattribute claims. They also propose CLAIMWRITER, a hierarchical claim-based writer that extracts source facts, maps them to an outline, and drafts sections from a source-linked claim representation, which reduces hallucination by 2.6 to 4.5 times and improves necessary-fact recall by 1.2 to 1.7 times while preserving overall report quality and enabling efficient localized revisions.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Sep 25

Claim-Gated Source-Risk Auditing for Generative Search

The paper introduces a claim‑gated audit framework for generative search, ensuring that a query, source, and answer tuple is only considered resolved when relationship evidence, answer adoption, materiality, and disclosure are all present. It distinguishes this audit endpoint from citation support and review priority, tying decisions to versioned evidence spans and implementing a reference checker to enforce the contract. Experiments on a synthetic dataset confirm that the system correctly handles all 81 predicate combinations and rejects 192 malformed records, while ablation studies isolate endpoint logic from missing‑evidence handling.

By Kainan Zhou, Chuhong Xu, Gangzhen Qian, Zhaoyi Li
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 23

Peerify: Benchmarking Peer-Review Claim Verification

arXiv:2609.25046v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Peer review plays a central role in scholarly publishing, yet verifying whether reviewer claims are supported by manuscript evidence remains a largely...

By Alireza Daghighfarsoodeh, Sajad Ebrahimi, Ali Ghorbanpour, Soroush Sadeghian, Radin Cheraghi, Negar Arabzadeh, Ebrahim Bagheri
arXiv AI
Aug 20

DeepWeaver: Bridging the Evidence Synthesis Gap in Open-Ended Question Answering

DeepWeaver is a framework designed to improve open‑ended question answering by weaving noisy retrieved evidence into comprehensive, well‑cited answers. It introduces Thought Block Chains (TBCs) that organize claims, key information, and supporting evidence, and uses subordinate TBCs to refine and expand the evidence before final generation. Evaluations on LoQA and DeepResearch Bench show that DeepWeaver enhances content sufficiency, citation grounding, and detail preservation across multiple LLMs.

By Xujia Wang, Yizhe Zhang, Bin Xu, Lei Hou, Juanzi Li