arXiv Machine Learning By David Kattermann, Lothar Sebastian Krapp

Recursively Enumerably Representable Classes and Computable Versions of the Fundamental Theorem of Statistical Learning

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2511. 02644v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study computable probably approximately correct (CPAC) learning, where learners are required to be computable functions.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 28

Algorithmic Principles For Multiclass Learning Are Hard To Come By: Limits of Regularization and Proper Learning

The paper investigates fundamental limits of algorithmic principles in multiclass learning, specifically proper learning and regularization. It shows that learning cannot always be reduced to proper learning even with an enlarged hypothesis class, that proper learners may need a sublinear number of errors that can be arbitrarily large, and that regularization (SRM or local) is not universally sufficient. The authors also provide a positive theory giving sufficient conditions for SRM learnability and a characterization via integrability of revealed preferences.

By Julian Asilis, Shaddin Dughmi, Vatsal Sharan, Alec Sun, Shang-Hua Teng, Chang Wang
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 29

Surprises in Proper Positive-Only Learning

arXiv:2606. 28309v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Binary classification from positive-only samples is a variant of PAC learning in which the learner receives i.

By Shai Ben-David, Farnam Mansouri, Anay Mehrotra, Manolis Zampetakis
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

Relatively Smart II: Tractable or Semi-Supervised Instance-Optimal Learning

The paper extends the study of relatively smart learning, showing that ERM and any proper consistent learner are relatively smart for binary classification in the distribution‑free setting, achieving a quadratic sample‑complexity blowup. It further demonstrates that semi‑supervised relatively smart learning is possible with only a quadratic blowup in unlabeled data and no blowup in labeled data, though this requires a leave‑most‑out transductive approach and incurs intractability when only an agnostic ERM oracle is available. The results clarify the trade‑offs between sample efficiency, label efficiency, and computational tractability in relatively smart learning.

By Shaddin Dughmi, Alireza F. Pour