arXiv AI
Recommender system in X inadvertently profiles ideological positions of users
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jun 3
LLM-Assisted Reranking to Operationalize Nuanced Objectives in Recommender Systems
arXiv:2606. 02883v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recommender systems have grown from content-organization tools into sophisticated systems that shape daily behavior.
arXiv AI
Sep 1
How Identity and Opinion Shape Political Sycophancy in LLMs
arXiv:2608.29198v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly encourage users to disclose personal profiles for tailored assistance, measuring their political alignment...
arXiv AI
Sep 4
Toward Collective-Centric Evaluation of Preference Inference for Participatory Democracy
The paper examines how Preference Inference (PI) models used in large-scale participatory democracy platforms can alter the perceived consensus and minority support by predicting missing votes. It introduces a collective‑centric evaluation framework that assesses whether inferred votes maintain key properties of the overall preference landscape, rather than focusing solely on individual prediction accuracy. Using the largest multilingual dataset to date—four consultations with over 90,000 participants, 1 million votes, and 22 languages—the study finds that models with similar predictive accuracy can differ markedly in how well they preserve the collective structure, underscoring that accuracy alone is insufficient for evaluating PI in democratic contexts.
arXiv AI
Sep 15
Issue Bias in Generative AI Writing Assistance: Political Issues and LLMs in the Swedish 2026 Election
arXiv:2609.15207v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative AI writing assistants and the Large Language Models (LLMs) that power them are increasingly part of how voters gather information before ele...
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 17
Making Political Text Scaling Comparable: Infrastructure and Hyperparameter Sensitivity for 17 Algorithms
The paper argues that computational text‑based ideal point estimation (CT‑IPE) methods should be viewed as configurable measurement pipelines rather than fixed estimators. It presents a large‑scale comparative experiment involving 17 CT‑IPE algorithms, 5,537 runs, and about 4.25 million left‑right position estimates, and describes shared infrastructure that enables joint execution of these heterogeneous methods. Sensitivity analyses reveal that most algorithms exhibit low hyperparameter sensitivity (ICC < .10), with any remaining sensitivity concentrated in a few key researcher choices such as the language or embedding model, seed keyword lists, and number of topics.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 18
Against Political Polarization: A Unified Framework for Tracing Evolving Political Ideologies on Social Media
The paper introduces TSN4PI, a unified framework for tracking the evolution of political ideologies on social media. It combines a PIDN module that uses large language models, style transfer, and unsupervised domain adaptation to detect ideologies and filter noise, with a PIPN module that employs temporal graph neural networks to predict future ideological shifts. The authors release two large-scale datasets and validate the approach on platforms such as X and Truth Social, offering empirical insights into political polarization and ideology evolution.