arXiv Computation and Language By Xiaomeng Hu, Jiaqi Hu, Hao Chen, Qi Zhang, Zhanming Shen, Wentao Ye, Junbo Zhao

Reasoning Error from Known Fact: Step-Level Self-Consistency Group Relative Policy Optimization for LLMs

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper introduces Step-level Self-Consistency Group Relative Policy Optimization (SSC‑GRPO), a method that assigns rewards to individual steps in a reasoning trace by evaluating self‑consistency across multiple rollouts. It targets Context‑Sensitive Factual Hallucinations—errors that arise when a model has the correct knowledge but produces false statements due to contextual interference. SSC‑GRPO outperforms previous approaches on mathematical reasoning benchmarks and hallucination leaderboards, offering a new way to detect and reduce hallucinations in large language model reasoning.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 25

GRACE: Step-Level Benchmark for Faithful Reasoning over Context

GRACE is a step‑level benchmark for evaluating the faithfulness of chain‑of‑thought reasoning over context. It provides human annotations for each step in CoT traces from 10 models across 4 datasets, labeling faithfulness, error category, and natural‑language explanations. The benchmark introduces a data‑driven taxonomy that splits errors into GRACE‑Inference (deductive) and GRACE‑Grounding (factual) tracks, each with four categories, and demonstrates that incorporating step‑level faithfulness signals can improve downstream accuracy and reasoning reliability.

By Hoang Pham, Dong Le, Anh Tuan Luu