← Back to all news
arXiv AI By Ao Cheng, Lei Zhang, Guowei He

Re4: Scientific Computing Agent with Rewriting, Resolution, Review and Revision

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces Re4, a scientific computing agent that employs a four-step logical chain—rewriting, resolution, review, and revision—using three large language models: a Consultant, a Programmer, and a Reviewer. The Consultant rewrites problem descriptions by linking them to domain knowledge, the Programmer generates and runs code, and the Reviewer iteratively refines the code through self-debugging. Experiments on PDEs, fluid dynamics, ill‑conditioned linear systems, and data‑driven physics show that this collaborative framework markedly improves bug‑free code generation and execution success rates across several LLMs.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Related stories

arXiv AI
Jul 17

ReasFlow: Assisting Reasoning-Centric Scientific Discovery in Applied Mathematics via a Knowledge-Based Multi-Agent System

arXiv:2607. 14178v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in Large Language Models have fueled autonomous AI agents capable of tackling complex scientific tasks, yet existing automated research systems remain predominantly focused on empirically driven domains with quantitative benchmarks, leaving theory-driven discovery, particularly in mathematically grounded disciplines requiring rigorous proofs and synthesis of domain knowledge, largely underexplored.

By Yutong He, Daibo Li, Guohong Li, Jiahe Geng, Zhengyang Huang, Can Ren, Zekun Zhang, Yifan Liu, Shuchen Zhu, Hengrui Zhang, Boao Kong, Ming Sun, Shu Li, Chenyi Li, Jiang Hu, Kun Yuan, Zaiwen Wen, Pingwen Zhang
llmsagentsbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv AI
Sep 18

SCICONVBENCH: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn Clarification for Task Formulation in Computational Science

SCICONVBENCH is a benchmark designed to evaluate large language models (LLMs) on multi‑turn clarification tasks in computational science. It focuses on two key abilities: eliciting missing information (disambiguation) and resolving contradictory requests (inconsistency resolution) across four domains—fluid mechanics, solid mechanics, materials science, and partial differential equations. The benchmark pairs a structured task ontology with a rubric‑based evaluation framework, measuring LLM performance in clarification behavior, conversational grounding, and final‑specification fidelity, and reveals that even top models only resolve about 52.7% of disambiguation cases in fluid mechanics while often making ungrounded assumptions.

By Nithin Somasekharan, Youssef Hassan, Shiyao Lin, Gihan Panapitiya, Patrick Emami, Anurag Acharya, Sameera Horawalavithana, Shaowu Pan
llmsagentsbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv AI
Sep 25

SciWalker: Synthesizing Scientific Coding Problems with Operator Graphs and Execution Feedback

SciWalker is a framework that automatically synthesizes scientific coding problems by sampling operator chains from scientific library interfaces and using execution feedback to refine generated problem statements, solutions, and tests. It produces 8,178 high‑quality problems across five scientific domains and 32 subdomains, and training a large language model with these problems improves its scientific coding accuracy by nearly 10 percentage points. The approach combines structured workflow composition with verification and quality review to enable scalable, scientifically grounded task generation.

By Chenxi Li, Wenxuan Zeng, Yun Luo, Fangchen Yu, Peng Ye, Yu Cheng, Jun Zhang
llmsreinforcement-learningbenchmarks
More like this →