arXiv Computation and Language By Zhibo Zhang, Yuxi Li, Zhen Ouyang, Ling Shi, Kailong Wang

RASET: Router-Agnostic Safety-Critical Expert Tuning Exposes Localized Safety Enforcement Failures in Mixture-of-Experts LLMs

Read the original on arXiv Computation and Language →

The paper introduces RASET, a router‑agnostic safety‑critical expert tuning framework for Mixture‑of‑Experts (MoE) large language models. RASET identifies a small subset of experts that are responsible for safety enforcement and applies parameter‑efficient tuning only to those experts, preserving the model’s intrinsic routing behavior. Experiments on five open‑weight MoE backbones show that RASET achieves a high safety‑bypass yield, outperforming existing baselines by a significant margin.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Computation and Language.

arXiv AI
Jun 2

MESA: Improving MoE Safety Alignment via Decentralized Expertise

arXiv:2606. 00651v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures scale Large Language Models (LLMs) efficiently, enabling greater capacity with reduced computational cost by dynamically routing inputs to relevant experts, yet introduce a critical vulnerability: Safety Sparsity, where safety capabilities concentrate in few experts, making them susceptible to adversarial bypassing.

By Yitong Sun, Yao Huang, Teng Li, Ranjie Duan, Yichi Zhang, Xingjun Ma, Hui Xue, Xingxing Wei
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 27

GRIP: Algorithm-Agnostic Machine Unlearning for Mixture-of-Experts via Geometric Router Constraints

The paper introduces GRIP, an algorithm‑agnostic framework for machine unlearning in Mixture‑of‑Experts large language models. GRIP enforces hard geometric constraints on router updates, projecting gradient changes into the null space of the retain set’s routing matrix to prevent routing manipulation. Two variants—training‑time stochastic projection and post‑training analytical correction—show significant improvements in routing stability, retain accuracy, and resistance to white‑box adversarial recovery across two MoE models.

By Andy Zhu, Rongzhe Wei, Yupu Gu, Pan Li
arXiv AI
2d ago

When Safety Routing Breaks: Understanding Alignment Fragility under Benign Fine-Tuning

The paper investigates why large language models lose safety alignment after benign fine‑tuning. It argues that safety alignment relies on a low‑rank, output‑routing geometry that becomes flatter during fine‑tuning, and that after only 100 benign examples this routing is sharpened in output‑side MLPs, leading to fragile safety while general performance remains relatively intact. Techniques like LoRA and ASAM can delay this collapse by reducing output‑side sharpness, but their effectiveness diminishes with larger fine‑tuning scales.

By Yitong Guo, Xiaoyi Chen, Siyuan Zhang, Xiaofeng Wang, Haixu Tang
arXiv AI
1d ago

SEAL: Reinforcing Global Safety in Mixture-of-Experts through Shared Expert ALignment

The paper introduces SEAL, a training-time, parameter‑efficient defense that attaches a plug‑and‑play adapter to the shared expert component of Mixture‑of‑Experts models, and SEAL++, which adds an orthogonal constraint to preserve existing safety subspaces. By leveraging the always‑activated shared expert, SEAL mitigates the structural vulnerability of sparse routing to adversarial manipulation, reducing attack success rates by up to 60% with minimal impact on model capability. The approach is evaluated across six attack scenarios involving harmful prompting, jailbreaks, malicious fine‑tuning, and neuron pruning.

By Qingyu Meng, Yiwei Zha, Jiahuan Pei, Koen Hindriks, Herbert Bos, Min Chen