arXiv:2606. 02488v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-hop question-answering systems often use expensive retrieval on every question.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
The paper introduces DRAG, a query‑adaptive framework that jointly selects retriever and generator configurations for Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. Two variants are presented: DRAG_QPP, a training‑free routing method using Query Performance Prediction and perplexity signals, and DRAG_SFT, a supervised approach that fine‑tunes an LLM to predict configurations. Experiments on three LLM families and four QA benchmarks show that DRAG_QPP matches strong static baselines while cutting inference latency, and DRAG_SFT consistently outperforms both static and training‑free adaptive baselines, demonstrating a better effectiveness‑efficiency trade‑off.
arXiv:2606. 02581v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) faces a fundamental three-way tension: deeper retrieval improves factual grounding but inflates token costs and end-to-end latency.
arXiv:2607. 05438v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) grounds a generator in evidence drawn from heterogeneous modalities -- text, tables, and images.
arXiv:2608. 08237v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems in production operate under strict service level objectives (SLOs) on tail latency and infrastructure cost.
The paper investigates multi‑hop question answering systems and identifies two distinct failure modes: retrieval failures, where the necessary passage is not retrieved, and extraction failures, where the passage is retrieved but the required fact cannot be extracted—a phenomenon termed the fact‑grounding gap. Across three standard benchmarks, extraction failures account for nearly half of all per‑hop deficiencies and are invisible to standard retrieval metrics, remaining unresolved by retrieval‑only interventions. The study shows that these two bottlenecks require different solutions, a distinction currently missing from evaluation practices.
arXiv:2606. 28361v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-step retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has been widely deployed as LLM-powered web services for complex question answering, where iterative retrieval-reasoning rounds deliver strong multi-hop accuracy.