arXiv Machine Learning By Mario Koddenbrock, Christoph Lange, Robin Legner, Martin J\"ager, Martin K\"ogler, Mariano N. Cruz Bournazou, Peter Neubauer, Felix Biessmann, Erik Rodner

RamanBench: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Machine Learning on Raman Spectroscopy

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 15

Machine Learning for Biomedical Raman Spectroscopy: From Spectral Acquisition to Clinical Translation

arXiv:2606. 14169v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Raman spectroscopy provides label-free, chemically specific characterization of biological systems and has become an important tool for cancer diagnosis, molecular subtyping, microbiological identification, and intraoperative decision support.

By Bogdan Oancea, Ana Maria Seciu-Grama, Nicoleta Siminea, Laura Mihaela Stefan, Alice Stoica, Joel Sjoberg, Marian Necula, Ana-Maria Prelipcean, Corneliu Ovidiu Vrancianu, Eduard Milea, Andrei P\u{a}un, Ion Petre, Mihaela P\u{a}un
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) Improves Classification Accuracy of Bacterial Raman Spectral Data Enabling Portable Diagnostics

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) is applied to improve the generalization of machine learning models for classifying bacterial Raman spectra, a technique that could enable rapid, portable diagnostics for antimicrobial resistance. The study shows that SAM can increase classification accuracy by up to 10.5% on a single data split and by an average of 2.7% across multiple splits compared to the traditional Adam optimizer. These gains demonstrate SAM’s potential to enhance the clinical utility of AI-powered Raman spectroscopy tools.

By Kaitlin Zareno, Jarett Dewbury, Siamak K. Sorooshyari, Hossein Mobahi, Loza F. Tadesse
arXiv AI
Sep 17

BOOM: Benchmarking Out-Of-distribution Molecular Property Predictions of Machine Learning Models

BOOM is a new benchmark for evaluating out‑of‑distribution (OOD) molecular property predictions in machine learning. It provides chemically‑informed tests across common property prediction tasks and assesses over 150 model‑task combinations. The study shows that current models, including chemical foundation models, struggle to generalize OOD, with the best model still exhibiting three times higher error than in‑distribution predictions.

By Evan R. Antoniuk, Shehtab Zaman, Tal Ben-Nun, Peggy Li, James Diffenderfer, Busra Sahin, Obadiah Smolenski, Everett Grethel, Tim Hsu, Anna M. Hiszpanski, Kenneth Chiu, Bhavya Kailkhura, Brian Van Essen