arXiv:2603.28773v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) frequently generate confident yet factually incorrect content when used for language generation (a phenomenon of...
By Dobrik Georgiev, Kheeran K. Naidu, Alberto Cattaneo, Federico Monti, Carlo Luschi, Daniel Justus
The paper introduces DRAG, a query‑adaptive framework that jointly selects retriever and generator configurations for Retrieval‑Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. Two variants are presented: DRAG_QPP, a training‑free routing method using Query Performance Prediction and perplexity signals, and DRAG_SFT, a supervised approach that fine‑tunes an LLM to predict configurations. Experiments on three LLM families and four QA benchmarks show that DRAG_QPP matches strong static baselines while cutting inference latency, and DRAG_SFT consistently outperforms both static and training‑free adaptive baselines, demonstrating a better effectiveness‑efficiency trade‑off.
By Neeraj Anand, Payel Santra, Partha Basuchowdhuri, Debasis Ganguly, Sumit Bhatia
arXiv:2610.34866v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities across tasks, but they still struggle with complex reasoning that requires integrating...
By Zicheng Zhao, Linhao Luo, Zongji Yu, Junnan Dong, Yanchao Tan, Shirui Pan, Chen Gong
arXiv:2609.10239v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Graph-based retrieval can improve multi-hop question answering, but existing approaches often incur high query-time costs and produce diffuse, oversi...
By Daniel Alejandro Coll Tejeda, Pedro Garc\'ia L\'opez, Daniel Barcelona-Pons
arXiv:2504. 20114v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems face significant challenges in multi-hop question answering (MHQA), where complex queries require synthesizing information across multiple document chunks.
By Zhonghao Li, Kunpeng Zhang, Jinghuai Ou, Shuliang Liu, Xuming Hu
The paper introduces EffiRAG, a graph-based retrieval‑augmented generation system that reduces the cost of building and querying a graph by using it only to locate relevant passages and generating answers from the original text. On the UltraDomain benchmark, EffiRAG outperforms LightRAG‑hybrid in 93 of 120 questions while cutting total system cost by 57 % (from USD 0.952 to USD 0.408). The study shows that graph‑based RAG can be both more accurate and cheaper, especially as the corpus grows, and recommends evaluating such systems on both answer quality and cost.
By Yuzhong Zhang, Haoyang Ma, Chao Peng, Lionel Briand, Boxi Yu, Jialun Cao