Simon Willison

Quoting Ted Sanders

Read the original on Simon Willison →

The article discusses how large language model (LLM) performance varies across many dimensions, noting that a single factor—model size—explains much of the variation. Larger models tend to be more reliable, cost more per token, and recall more obscure facts. It also explains OpenAI’s naming convention, where version numbers indicate release order, relatedness to other models, and the scale of improvement, using examples like Luna, Terra, Sol, and Astra.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at Simon Willison.

Simon Willison
Sep 22

Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Sol, GPT-6 Luna, and a new price war

The article reports the release of new AI models: Claude Opus 5.5 by Anthropic and GPT‑6 Sol and GPT‑6 Luna by OpenAI, noting that GPT‑6 variants are priced at half the cost of their GPT‑5.6 counterparts. It provides a detailed pricing table comparing input, cached input, and output costs across several models, highlighting how GPT‑6 Luna is among the cheapest ever offered by OpenAI. The author also comments on visual differences in model outputs, noting that GPT‑6 outputs are more muted compared to GPT‑5.6.

Simon Willison
Sep 29

GPT 6.1 Sol: Near-Astra intelligence for a fifth of the price

Simon Willison comments on GPT 6.1‑Sol, describing it as "Near‑Astra intelligence for a fifth of the price." He notes that the model’s pelican illustrations are similar to those of the GPT‑6 family and provides links to the live‑blog of the keynote and to the pelican images. The post is tagged with AI, OpenAI, generative‑AI, LLMs, and playful references to pelican‑riding‑a‑bicycle.

Simon Willison
Sep 1

Claude Fable 5.1 made me a really nice animated pelican

The article discusses Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5.1 release, highlighting its claimed improvements in coding, knowledge work, and problem‑solving, particularly a 52.6% score on the new Terminal‑Bench‑Science 0.1 benchmark. The author examines the model’s performance on the pelican benchmark, noting that Fable 5.1’s five reasoning levels (low, medium, high, xhigh, max) sometimes skip reasoning entirely for certain prompts, as evidenced by token counts and cost metrics. The piece provides detailed transcript data for each reasoning level when generating an SVG of a pelican riding a bicycle.

Simon Willison
Sep 2

llm-gemini 0.34

The release of llm-gemini 0.34 introduces the new Gemini 3.8‑Flash model, available in low, medium, and high thinking levels, and fixes an issue where async responses failed to record the resolved model version. The update also notes that Google has released Gemini 3.8‑Flash (and a restricted 3.8 Flash Cyber version) today, with example outputs (pelicans) demonstrating the model’s performance across the different thinking levels. The author highlights Gemini Flash’s speed, low cost, and competence in generating HTML, JavaScript, and Markdown‑SVG content, citing a 13‑second, 1.8‑cent example of an HTML output.