arXiv AI By Janek Gro{\ss}, Elena Zentgraf, Jens Heidrich

Quality Metrics for LLM-Generated Asset Administration Shells: A Perturbation-Based Evaluation Approach

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper introduces a perturbation-based framework to evaluate quality metrics for large language model (LLM) generated Asset Administration Shells (AAS). By systematically degrading AAS outputs across multiple dimensions, the study identifies that exact property name matching and value-based recall, along with name-based F1 score, best reflect quality changes. Experiments on 6,400 AAS instances from 200 products across GPT‑4o‑mini, Qwen3, and DeepSeek‑R1 reveal how different perturbations affect metrics and highlight variations among model families and product segments.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 7

Auto-DSM Under the Lens: A Black-Box Evaluation Framework for LLM-Based DSM Generation

This paper presents a black-box evaluation framework to systematically assess the ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate Design Structure Matrices (DSMs) from structured technical documentation. Motivated by the closed-source nature of current Auto-DSM pipelines, the framework introduces a reproducible methodology that benchmarks generated DSMs (GEN-DSMs) against manually validated ground-truth matrices (GT-DSMs).