arXiv Machine Learning By Xutao Wang, Hanting Chen, Tianyu Guo, Yunhe Wang

PUe: Biased Positive-Unlabeled Learning Enhancement by Causal Inference

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2607. 13428v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning aims to achieve high-accuracy binary classification with limited labeled positive examples and numerous unlabeled ones.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

Focused PU learning from imbalanced data

arXiv:2605.14467v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We propose a new method of learning from positive and unlabeled (PU) examples in highly imbalanced datasets. Many real-world problems, such as dise...

By Elias Zavitsanos, Georgios Paliouras
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

AUC Maximization from Biased Positive-unlabeled Data with Confidence

The paper introduces a method for maximizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) when only biased positive and unlabeled (PU) data are available. It leverages confidence scores—probabilities that an instance is positive—associated with a small set of labeled positives to derive an AUC risk estimator that accounts for bias. Experiments on eight real-world datasets demonstrate the method’s effectiveness.

By Atsutoshi Kumagai, Tomoharu Iwata, Hiroshi Takahashi, Taishi Nishiyama, Kazuki Adachi, Yasuhiro Fujiwara
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 2

Tailoring Strictly Proper Scoring Rules for Downstream Tasks: An Application to Causal Inference

Probabilistic models are typically trained using task-agnostic objectives like log-loss, which can lead to significant errors in downstream estimation. This disconnect is especially critical in Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) for causal inference, where propensity score errors near $0$ and $1$ often lead to high bias and variance.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 24

Learning Risk Scores Robust to Unobserved Confounders

The paper introduces a method for learning risk scores that remain reliable even when historical data contain unobserved confounders. By treating propensity weights as uncertain and applying sensitivity analysis with Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization, the authors formulate a robust learning problem solvable via an exponential cone program. Experiments on semi‑synthetic UCI data show the approach improves calibration by up to 29.2% over traditional benchmarks and 11.1% over the state of the art, without harming other performance metrics.

By Ryan Edmonds, Yingxiao Ye, Sina Aghaei, Andr\'es G\'omez, \c{C}a\u{g}{\i}l Ko\c{c}yi\u{g}it, Phebe Vayanos