arXiv:2606. 09816v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Standard diffusion models typically use a single time-homogeneous Gaussian terminal distribution as the reference law for generation.
By Danqi Zhuang, Jisui Huang, Xiaoyue Xi, Andrew Kiggins, Xiaojie Wang, Ke Chen, Yue Wu
arXiv:2608. 04827v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We introduce the Intrinsic Hybrid Latent Diffusion Model (ILDM), a generative framework that integrates probabilistic dimensionality reduction with geometry-aware diffusion on unknown manifolds.
By Yizhu Wang, Mu Niu, Xiaochen Yang
We introduce the Intrinsic Hybrid Latent Diffusion Model (ILDM), a generative framework that integrates probabilistic dimensionality reduction with geometry-aware diffusion on unknown manifolds. While diffusion models (DMs) have achieved state-of-the-art results in high-dimensional data synthesis, they rely on large training datasets and ignore intrinsic geometric structure.
arXiv:2602. 17706v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Diffusion models learn data distributions indirectly through denoising, making the difficulty of generative modeling closely tied to the dependency structure of data.
By Rongyao Cai, Yuxi Wan, Kexin Zhang, Ming Jin, Zhiqiang Ge, Qingsong Wen, Yong Liu
The article "Foundations of Diffusion Models in General State Spaces: A Self-Contained Introduction" presents a unified primer on diffusion models that applies to both continuous Euclidean data and discrete categorical structures. It develops discrete-time forward noising via Markov kernels and learned reverse dynamics, and connects these to continuous-time limits such as stochastic differential equations in ρ^d and continuous-time Markov chains on finite alphabets, deriving the corresponding Fokker–Planck and master equations. The work also shows how different forward corruption choices—Gaussian processes for continuous spaces and structured categorical transition kernels for discrete spaces—affect reverse dynamics and the evidence lower bound used in training, offering a layered exposition for newcomers, practitioners, and experts alike.
By Vincent Pauline, Tobias H\"oppe, Kirill Neklyudov, Alexander Tong, Stefan Bauer, Andrea Dittadi
FlowSGS introduces a flow-based posterior sampling method that combines Split Gibbs Sampling (SGS) with Langevin dynamics for the likelihood step and Stochastic Interpolants (SI) for the prior step. By integrating a pretrained flow model into the prior step via SI's reverse-time SDE and a novel timestep correction, FlowSGS reduces the number of network evaluations compared to plug‑and‑play diffusion samplers. Experiments demonstrate state‑of‑the‑art performance on various inverse problems, including the first flow‑based solution to a nonlinear inverse problem (Fourier phase retrieval).
By Tianao Li, Xinhui Qian, Emma Alexander