arXiv AI By Marius F. R. Juston, Kevin A. Karim, Jonathan Gao, Kevin C. Li, Rudhi Bashambu

Prompt Minimization: Reducing Input Redundancy Without Sacrificing Output Fidelity

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper investigates prompt minimization, aiming to reduce prompts to their smallest, most information-dense form without losing output fidelity. It argues that shorter prompts lower computational overhead and inference latency, especially when large contexts are unnecessarily included, and that longer prompts can harm LLM reasoning and accuracy. The authors propose three frameworks to identify minimal prompts and show that these often produce outputs comparable to longer versions, highlighting redundancy in the input space and opening new avenues for efficient prompt engineering.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Learning a Single Token to Replace Long System Prompts in LLMs

arXiv:2511.23271v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Long system prompts are widely used to steer Large Language Models (LLMs), but repeatedly processing them at inference time is inefficient and cons...

By Jiancheng Dong, Pengyue Jia, Jingyu Peng, Maolin Wang, Yuhao Wang, Lixin Su, Xin Sun, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, Xiangyu Zhao
arXiv AI
1d ago

How Much Prompt Is Enough? A Blackbox Minimization of Few-Shots in LLMs

The paper introduces ramework, a blackbox prompt‑minimization framework that identifies the minimal subset of few‑shot prompts necessary for large language models (LLMs). In a case study, the framework reduces few‑shot exemplars by an average of 65.3% in character count while maintaining full propositional output fidelity, revealing that models tend to keep logical identifiers and constraint declarations while discarding natural language prose. The analysis further distinguishes between universal encoder and decoder models, offering insights into prompt compression and structural analysis.

By Ali Alfageeh, Rahul Gopinath, Amin Alipour
arXiv AI
Aug 24

Beyond Prompt Engineering: A Systematic Analysis of Prompt Lexical Sensitivity and Its Impacts on Quality

The paper investigates how small lexical changes in prompts can cause large performance swings in large language models. Using a dataset of 132,000 prompt variants, the authors uncover a scaling law linking higher average task performance to lower variance and greater robustness. They identify domain-specific terminology and explicit action directives as key linguistic factors that stabilize prompts, and propose an automated Prompt-Refining Agent that reduces performance variance by 40.7% in code generation while maintaining or improving mean performance.

By Qipeng Xie, Zi Liang, Jiafei Wu, Yufei Chen, Weizheng Wang, Wenao Ma, Zhong Ming, Haiqin Yang, Kaishun Wu
arXiv AI
Aug 24

SCOPE: A Generative Approach for LLM Prompt Compression

SCOPE is a training‑free generative prompt‑compression framework that reduces LLM input length by chunking a prompt into semantically coherent segments, rewriting each chunk to be more concise, and then reconstructing a coherent prompt. Unlike token‑removal methods, SCOPE’s chunk‑level rewriting preserves critical information and text coherence, and includes optimization techniques for finer‑grained control of compression ratios. Extensive evaluations on question‑answering and summarization tasks show that SCOPE consistently outperforms selective compression baselines, especially at high compression ratios.

By Tinghui Zhang, Yifan Wang, Daisy Zhe Wang
arXiv AI
Aug 20

Evaluating and Explaining Prompt Sensitivity of LLMs Using Interactions

The paper introduces a fine-grained method called interactions to analyze prompt sensitivity in large language models (LLMs). By decomposing output scores into nonlinear interactions, the authors show that subtle prompt changes can destabilize these interactions even when overall outputs stay unchanged. They propose an Interaction-based Prompt Sensitivity (IPS) metric and use it to evaluate 50 open-source LLMs, finding that supervised fine‑tuning, larger model scales, dense architectures, and few‑shot learning all reduce prompt sensitivity, primarily by stabilizing low‑order interactions.

By Ruiyang Qin, Qingzhuo Wang, Tian Wang, Zhihua Wei, Wen Shen