Hugging Face Trending Papers
Oct 22

Abstract Priorities, Concrete Rewards: How Stated Preferences Relate to What People Reward in AI Responses

The study examines how users’ stated preferences for AI assistant responses align with the actual rewards they give to those responses. Using the PRISM dataset, researchers compared 1,396 participants’ reported priorities on seven response attributes with their ratings of 29,347 responses from 21 large language models. They found that features not explicitly surveyed—such as length, formatting, and refusal language—were as strongly linked to ratings as the surveyed attributes, and that written feedback and prior conversation context influenced how much weight participants gave to length, while overall stated priorities poorly predicted the concrete features that drive ratings.

arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 23

Abstract Priorities, Concrete Rewards: How Stated Preferences Relate to What People Reward in AI Responses

The study investigates how users’ stated preferences for AI-generated responses align with the actual features they reward. Using the PRISM dataset, researchers compared participants’ reported priorities for seven response attributes with their ratings of over 29,000 responses from 21 large language models. They found that attributes not explicitly surveyed—such as length, formatting, and refusal language—were as strongly linked to ratings as the surveyed ones, and that written feedback was a better predictor of how users weighted these concrete features than their stated priorities.

By Zihan Chen, Lei Nico Zheng, Di Zhu