In natural human-AI dialogue, users' corrections, requests, and self-descriptions carry reusable signals about how they want work to be done. These signals reveal individual process preferences, user-...
arXiv:2605.12682v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as reasoning modules in many applications, yet they often struggle to produce human-aligned deci...
By Alina Hyk, Sandhya Saisubramanian
arXiv:2608.29464v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring assumes that reasoning traces faithfully record the information that shapes a model's answer. Existing faithfulness...
By Aryo Pradipta Gema, Neel Rajani, Rohit Saxena, Wai-Chung Kwan, Pasquale Minervini
The study examines how users’ stated preferences for AI assistant responses align with the actual rewards they give to those responses. Using the PRISM dataset, researchers compared 1,396 participants’ reported priorities on seven response attributes with their ratings of 29,347 responses from 21 large language models. They found that features not explicitly surveyed—such as length, formatting, and refusal language—were as strongly linked to ratings as the surveyed attributes, and that written feedback and prior conversation context influenced how much weight participants gave to length, while overall stated priorities poorly predicted the concrete features that drive ratings.
The study investigates how users’ stated preferences for AI-generated responses align with the actual features they reward. Using the PRISM dataset, researchers compared participants’ reported priorities for seven response attributes with their ratings of over 29,000 responses from 21 large language models. They found that attributes not explicitly surveyed—such as length, formatting, and refusal language—were as strongly linked to ratings as the surveyed ones, and that written feedback was a better predictor of how users weighted these concrete features than their stated priorities.
By Zihan Chen, Lei Nico Zheng, Di Zhu
arXiv:2608.18085v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Prior work has shown that large language models can express diverse personality traits in open-ended text generation, but it is unclear whether the...
By Maryam Shoaeinaeini, Brent Harrison, A. B. Siddique