arXiv Machine Learning By Enrico Verdolotti, Luca Luceri, Silvia Giordano

Predicting, Evaluating, and Explaining Top Misinformation Spreaders via Archetypal User Behavior

Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →

arXiv:2608. 16323v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The spread of misinformation on social networks poses a significant challenge to online communities and society at large.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 25

Why Does Misinformation Propagate Faster? An Algorithmic Perspective on X

The paper investigates why misinformation spreads more quickly on engagement‑based platforms by dissecting the recommendation algorithm of X. It identifies an engagement fungibility mechanism that rewards instant reactions (likes, retweets) over thoughtful engagement (replies, quotes), allowing misinformation—which tends to attract instant reactions—to receive more recommendations. The authors validate this mechanism through a simulation on the USC X 2024 election corpus, showing that adjusting metric weights has little effect, while requiring thoughtful engagement before amplification can significantly reduce the credibility exposure gap without harming mainstream content or engagement.

By Pan Li, Shuang Gao
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 18

FakeSpotter: A content and strategy agnostic Viral Misinformation Detection Tool

FakeSpotter is a new tool that estimates the viral misinformation risk of textual content by measuring structural fingerprints of misinformation instead of directly judging truthfulness. It operates across linguistic, narrative, logical, and critical‑thinking dimensions, using repeated large language model assessments and domain‑specific logistic regression classifiers for both short and long texts. In a labeled corpus of 764 texts, FakeSpotter achieved macro F1 scores of 0.788 for short texts and 0.793 for long texts, and its interpretive layer offers explainable outputs such as feature‑based scores, signal agreement, and a caution index for social listening.

By Giovanni Spitale, Federico Germani