arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

Greedy Decoding Is Not Precision-Invariant: Cross-Precision Output Divergence in LLM Inference

The paper demonstrates that greedy decoding from large language models is not precision‑invariant: the same model, prompt, and decoding algorithm can produce different outputs when run in BF16 versus FP16 on identical hardware. Across six models (1.1B–7B parameters, four families, and 12B) and three benchmarks, 49–100 % of prompts diverge, with a single token flip often cascading into trajectory‑level divergence. The authors develop an empirical error‑propagation analysis that identifies the top‑two logit margin at the LM head as the key factor, and they propose a low‑overhead intervention—selective FP32 LM head recomputation—that improves exact agreement by 22–36 percentage points with less than 4 % latency overhead. "whyItMatters":"The findings reveal that precision choices can fundamentally alter model outputs, challenging the assumption of deterministic greedy decoding and highlighting the need for precision‑aware inference strategies."

By Gaoyuan Du, Anam Nawaz Khan, Rex Zhou, Xiaoyang Liu, Deepayan Chakrabarti, Fnu Suya, Xueping Li
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 9

Generalist Vision-Language Models for Fast Radio Burst detection: a zero-shot benchmark against a specialized detector

arXiv:2607. 07382v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are millisecond-duration radio transients whose automated detection increasingly relies on highly specialized deep learning models.

By Raiff H. Santos, Amilcar R. Queiroz, Tharcisyo S. S. Duarte, K. E. L. de Farias, Rafael A. Batista
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 5

The Conflict Between Logic and Memory: Training Conditions for Optimizer-Dependent Rule Acquisition

The paper investigates how different optimizers acquire distinct generalizing relations in single‑hidden‑layer ReLU networks. By manipulating nuisance‑connected weights and performing a strict‑parity sweep, the authors show that training conditions reshape both shared failures and relative optimizer advantages, with specific interventions improving accuracy on hard stages. The study also compares optimizer behavior across tasks and an external architecture (CIFAR‑10).

By Gongyue Zhang, Honghai Liu