← Back to all news
arXiv AI By Max Achterweust, Stefan Groot Nibbelink, Vincent J. de Beer, Stefan Schipper, Zeynep Y\"uksektepe, Pedro Andrade da Silva, Aurelia Peppelaar, Martijn J. van der Willigen, Christophe B. Minkenberg, Robert F. van der Willigen

PRAISE: A Reproducible Workflow for Non-Programmer Scientists to Implement Published AI Models

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.

Related stories

arXiv AI
Sep 16

ScienceBuddy: Recursive-in-Recursive Self-Improvement for Interactive Scientific Agents

arXiv:2609.17523v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce and release ScienceBuddy, an interactive scientific research workspace that brings continually improving scientific agents into researcher...

By Shuhan Xue, Jianyuan Zhong, Ziyuan Nan, Wenbin Li, Zhaochen Yu, Jinchao Ding, Qiang Gao, Pengyu Zhan, Yuntong Zhang, Tian Cheng, Zhenfei Yin, Yingcheng Wu, Ling Yang
agentsreinforcement-learningbenchmarks
More like this →
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 2

Modelpedia: A Catalog of Model Findings for the Meta-Science of AI

Modelpedia is an automated, LLM-assisted framework that extracts and organizes findings about AI models from published papers into a searchable public catalog. It links each finding to the relevant model, dataset, method, and concept, and has already extracted over a thousand findings from ICLR 2024 and 2025 papers. The authors invite the community to explore, contribute to, and build on this open catalog, positioning model findings as a shared foundation for the meta‑science of AI.

By Franciszek Bernat (Centre for Credible AI, Warsaw University of Technology), Dawid P{\l}udowski (Centre for Credible AI, Warsaw University of Technology), Micha{\l} Jan W{\l}odarczyk (Centre for Credible AI, Warsaw University of Technology), Luca Longo (University College Cork), Jianlong Zhou (University of Technology Sydney), Andreas Holzinger (Human-Centered AI Lab), Riccardo Guidotti (University of Pisa, ISTI-CNR), Wojciech Samek (Technical University of Berlin, Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data), Przemys{\l}aw Biecek (Centre for Credible AI, University of Warsaw)
llms
More like this →
arXiv AI
Sep 25

AI in Science: Early Insights

The paper "AI in Science: Early Insights" analyzes AI’s impact on scientific work using data from 15 million Gemini interactions, 2,600 specialized AI models, and a survey of 600 scientists. It finds widespread AI adoption, complementary use of large language models and specialized tools, significant productivity gains of about seven hours per week, and a shift in research bottlenecks toward hypothesis backlog and verification needs. The study suggests AI can boost scientific productivity but its full effect depends on addressing new downstream challenges.

By Mihai Codreanu, Alex Imas, Juan Mateos-Garcia, Joseph Emmens, Evalyne Muiruri, Arthur Turrell, Julian Jacobs, Atoosa Kasirzadeh, Ana Trisovic, Yiyuan Chen, Tanya Rodchenko, Catherine Pollard, Scott Strand, Daniel Rock, Zanna Iscenko, Fabien Curto Millet, Neil Thompson, James Manyika
llms
More like this →