arXiv Machine Learning
Position: Privacy Is a Claim, Not a Property of Synthetic Data
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago
Rethinking Anonymity Claims in Synthetic Data Generation: A Model-Centric Privacy Attack Perspective
The paper argues that evaluating anonymity in synthetic data generation must focus on the generative model rather than just the resulting dataset. It interprets GDPR definitions of personal data and anonymization under realistic model-access scenarios, mapping these to state‑of‑the‑art privacy attacks. The authors conclude that synthetic data alone is insufficient for anonymization, and that Differential Privacy offers stronger protection than Similarity‑based Privacy Metrics.
arXiv AI
Jul 22
Phantoms and Disclosures: A Statistical Framework for Auditing Privacy in Synthetic Data
arXiv:2606. 16952v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The rapid adoption of generative AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) has spurred interest in synthetic data as a privacy-preserving alternative to sensitive real-world datasets.
arXiv AI
Jun 16
Phantoms and Disclosures: a Causal Framework for Auditing Synthetic Data
arXiv:2606. 16952v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid adoption of generative AI and Large Language Models (LLMs) has spurred interest in synthetic data as a privacy-preserving alternative to sensitive real-world datasets.
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 5
Quantifying the Privacy of Counterfactuals by Leveraging Membership Inference Attacks Against Synthetic Data
arXiv:2606. 06334v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Counterfactuals are typically used in high-stakes decision areas to explain a machine learning model by showing how changes to the user profiles result in the desired outcome.
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 1
Revisiting the Provable-Auditable Privacy Gap of DP-SGD
arXiv:2608.28934v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Differential privacy (DP) has traditionally been used to provide theoretical upper bounds on an algorithm's stability to changing its training data. In...
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 18
On the Inherent Privacy Amplification of Missing Data
The paper explores how missing data can inherently enhance privacy in machine learning. By integrating missingness into a differential privacy framework, the authors demonstrate that the absence of certain features can amplify privacy guarantees without altering the underlying algorithm. This reveals a previously overlooked interaction between data incompleteness and formal privacy protections.