Tool-using agents consume external data from sources with different levels of trust, yet tool responses rarely identify who produced each component or what it should convey. We show that this gap enables state-corruption attacks, in which attacker-controlled content makes environmental claims beyond the informational authority of its response component and corrupts the agent's perceived environment, making the resulting action appear justified to existing guardrails.
arXiv:2606. 09084v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tool-using LLM agents interact with the world through actions that persist state in artifacts (e.
By Xiaofeng Lin, Yukai Yang, Daniel Guo, Sahil Arun Nale, Charles Fleming, Guang Cheng
Tool-using LLM agents interact with the world through actions that persist state in artifacts (e. g.
arXiv:2607. 24625v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous LLM agents processing mixed-confidentiality data face severe security risks from prompt injection attacks and reasoning errors.
By Arseny Kravchenko, Vadim Liventsev, Innokentii Konstantinov, Ildar Iskhakov, Matvey Kukuy
arXiv:2607. 01236v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: As LLM agents gain increasing access to powerful tools, ensuring that their actions are aligned with the user's intent becomes critical.
By Yining She, Yiliang Liang, Eunsuk Kang
arXiv:2608. 10509v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Shared memory helps language-model agents reuse information across long workflows, yet relevant evidence may not be admissible for a particular agent or action.
By Yiqi Wang, Zihao Yan, Jiaqi Zhang, Zhangkai Wu, Mingkai Zheng, Zequn Sun, Yanming Zhu, Taotao Cai