Persistent Retrieval for Conversational Agents: A Study of Retrieval Efficiency
Read the original on Hugging Face Trending Papers →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at Hugging Face Trending Papers.
The paper investigates how different retrieval designs affect conversational agents. Three approaches are compared: skill-based retrieval in the main agent, a non‑persistent retrieval subagent that generates findings, and a persistent retrieval subagent that keeps history and returns evidence to the main agent. The persistent design reduces token usage and API cost by 43.3% and 45.0% respectively, cuts response time by 9.1%, and allows the main agent to request corrections from the subagent.
An agent that uses tools typically responds to what the user explicitly asks, yet completing the task may require information the user never requested. Work on proactive agents mainly studies whether...
arXiv:2609.37236v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: An agent that uses tools typically responds to what the user explicitly asks, yet completing the task may require information the user never requested....
The paper introduces OPSD, a method that uses on‑policy self‑distillation to train a context‑free student model from a teacher conditioned on user memory, combined with a verify‑then‑regenerate router that directs queries to either weight or text memory. OPSD enables weight memory to compete with or surpass traditional text‑based memory systems on the HaluMem benchmark, reducing token usage per query. The study also explores how different training recipes influence weight memory performance and offers guidance for integrating it with retrieval in persistent, multi‑session agent deployments.
arXiv:2608.22266v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In the context of information seeking, conversational agents are undergoing an evolution from reactive tools to proactive, personalized assistants. A c...
The paper introduces RD-Forget, a training‑free framework that separates what a persistent language agent stores from what it uses at answer time. It keeps a source archive of all observations while a query‑conditioned memory view filters evidence relevant to the current question, using a frozen language‑model curator to group facts into semantic slots and preserve multi‑hop relations. The approach employs rate‑distortion principles to stay within a memory budget and demonstrates improvements across conversational memory, knowledge updating, fact consolidation, long‑context reasoning, and personalization tasks.