arXiv AI By Evan Duan

Perplexity Can Miss SAE Feature Damage Under Quantization

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2606. 03002v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Quantization is a standard path to deploying large language models, and quantized models are typically judged acceptable when perplexity or downstream accuracy remains close to the full-precision original.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 22

Perplexity Cost Understates What Activation Quantisation Breaks

The paper investigates how activation quantisation affects different computational aspects of language models. While perplexity remains a reliable overall metric, it fails to reveal that induction accuracy stays high while retrieval accuracy drops significantly. Experiments show that the damage depends on more than just error magnitude, and that rotating the basis can recover induction performance even at low bit‑rates.

By Anish Sathyanarayanan
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 2

The Structure of Quantization Damage in LLMs: Why the Next Bit Should Be Spent Globally

The paper investigates where post‑training quantization (PTQ) harms large language models (LLMs) and how to best allocate a limited precision budget. By causally raising each layer to 8‑bit precision across nine open‑weight models, the authors find that quantization damage is diffuse rather than concentrated in specific task circuits or weight statistics, and that globally refining quantization granularity outperforms selectively protecting the most recoverable layers. They also observe that the residual accuracy loss is budget‑limited and that peak recovery locations correlate with architecture within families but not across families.

By Jundong Hu, Shekar Ramachandran