arXiv:2606. 16690v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Learning-based manipulation policies have made substantial progress in real-world robot manipulation, particularly for short-horizon action generation.
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2607. 29169v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language-action (VLA) policies achieve strong performance in robotic manipulation but remain vulnerable to runtime disturbances that break the temporal alignment among visual observations, robot states, and executed actions.
arXiv:2606. 08508v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative robot policies fail unpredictably at deployment: they hesitate at critical moments, drift off-task, or commit to unrecoverable actions.
arXiv:2605. 21862v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Chunked vision-language-action (VLA) policies predict multi-step robot controls, conditioning each update on the current visual observation alone.
arXiv:2608. 07065v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Action-chunking visuomotor policies learn from demonstrations and improve temporal consistency by predicting short action sequences rather than single-step commands.
arXiv:2608. 13438v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Contact-rich manipulation failures are often detected only after the robot has committed to contact.
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have attracted growing interest as a scalable approach to robotic manipulation. While these models are effective action predictors, deploying them as robotic agents exposes critical gaps: no mechanism for failure recovery, inconsistent execution over long horizons, and limited robustness to shifts in observations, tasks, or embodiments.