Parity, Sensitivity, and Transformers
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2608.31067v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning generalizable algorithmic computations remains a challenge for neural networks, as reflected in persistent failures on compositional and lengt...
arXiv:2607. 17624v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Transformers are remarkably versatile and their design is largely consistent across a variety of applications.
arXiv:2607. 04319v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A companion paper showed that a transformer's feed-forward layer can be rebuilt from explicit fuzzy set operations - intersection, set-difference, and a self-forgetting sequence quantifier - so its hidden units read as named logical operators at no cost to language-model quality.
The paper proves that deep residual self‑attention networks can universally interpolate between any two collections of sequences using only two fixed single‑head attention blocks with Gaussian‑initialized projections. The interpolation is achieved by varying the order, signs, and durations of these blocks, independent of the specific input and output sequences. The result holds for both continuous and finite depth, and the authors also extend the analysis to causal‑masked settings.
A companion paper showed that a transformer's feed-forward layer can be rebuilt from explicit fuzzy set operations - intersection, set-difference, and a self-forgetting sequence quantifier - so its hidden units read as named logical operators at no cost to language-model quality. That left the other half of the transformer opaque.
arXiv:2607. 22361v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study information bottlenecks in modern deep-learning architectures -- RNNs, softmax transformers, linear-attention transformers and state-space models -- through the lens of the indexing primitive.