arXiv Machine Learning
ParA-LLM: A Unified Approach to Paralinguistic and Acoustic Speech Understanding
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
Related stories
arXiv Computation and Language
1d ago
The Bairong System for MLC-SLM 2026: Dynamic Question-Aware Evidence Routing for Multilingual Conversational Speech Understanding
arXiv:2609.22214v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long multilingual conversational spoken question answering requires systems to balance long-range transcript semantics with sparse acoustic and speaker...
arXiv AI
Sep 1
HEAR Who Said What: Unlocking Speaker-Attributed Reasoning via Counterfactual Voice Grounding
arXiv:2608.29120v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Speech Language Models (SLMs) are increasingly deployed in multi-speaker environments, yet their ability to attribute speech to the correct speaker a...
arXiv AI
Jun 15
AudioDER: A Deduplication-Enhanced Reasoning Dataset for Post-Training Large Audio-Language Models
arXiv:2606. 14591v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) have shown strong performance on a wide range of audio understanding tasks, yet they still struggle with complex audio reasoning.
arXiv AI
Jun 30
ORCA: Open-ended Response Correctness Assessment for Audio Question Answering
arXiv:2512. 09066v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reliable assessment of the abilities of large audio language models (LALMs) is essential to advancing the state of the art.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 23
ParaPairAudioBench: Paralinguistic Pairwise Audio Benchmark for LALM-as-a-Judge
Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) have been widely used as judge models for the automatic evaluation of generated speech. However, prior approaches predominantly focus on holistic naturalness, leaving fine-grained paralinguistic distinctions underexplored.
arXiv AI
Jul 17
RW-Voice-EQ Bench: A Real World Benchmark for Evaluating Voice AI Systems
arXiv:2607. 14846v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Current voice AI benchmarks typically evaluate isolated capabilities such as speech intelligibility, word error rate, or text-based dialogue quality, but they rarely test whether systems harness the acoustic information that distinguishes spoken language from its textual representation.