arXiv:2610.15158v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: We study neuro-symbolic natural language inference (NLI) with independently translated propositional representations of the premise and hypothesis....
By Xuyao Feng, Antonis Bikakis
arXiv:2603. 06114v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Real-world arguments in text and dialogues are normally enthymemes (i.
By Xuyao Feng, Anthony Hunter
arXiv:2601.20055v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Despite the syntactic fluency of Large Language Models (LLMs), ensuring their logical correctness in high-stakes domains remains a fundamenta...
By Vikash Singh, Darion Cassel, Nathaniel Weir, Nick Feng, Sam Bayless
arXiv:2606. 03969v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reliable uncertainty communication is critical to the trustworthiness of LLMs, yet faithful calibration (FC)--the alignment between models' intrinsic and (linguistically) expressed confidence--is a persistent failure mode.
By Areeb Gani, Asal Meskin, Gabrielle Kaili-May Liu, Arman Cohan
The paper introduces a pipeline that automatically creates ontology‑grounded multiple‑choice question benchmarks for evaluating large language models (LLMs) on logical reasoning tasks in scientific AI. By using OWL 2 ontologies, correct answers are guaranteed by design and distractors are generated and formally verified as incorrect through an OWL reasoner. Experiments on three ontologies—Pizza, PMDco, and DOID—yielded 112, 2,491, and 15,216 MCQs, respectively, with high natural‑language quality and challenging zero‑shot performance for six LLMs.
By Nishtha N. Vaidya, Stephan Grimm, Thomas Hubauer, Thomas A. Runkler
arXiv:2405.01259v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Argumentation is an important cognitive activity that involves the scrutiny of arguments and counterarguments. When given an argument, it is desira...
By Xuyao Feng, Anthony Hunter