arXiv:2609.38108v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) enable agents to solve long-horizon tasks by generating a plan and then executing it in an environment. However, successfu...
By Subba Reddy Oota, Francisco Herrera, Jordi Cabot Sagrera, Marcos L\'opez de Prado, Shadab Khan
arXiv:2606. 11440v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing multi-agent LLM orchestration methods, ranging from brute-force ensembles to learned routers, select models and topologies based on task and model features.
By Ahasan Kabir, Jiaqi Xue, Mengxin Zheng, Qian Lou
FL-MAESTRO is a multi‑agent orchestrator that uses three specialized large language model agents to jointly decide the communication topology, per‑client resource allocation, and aggregation rule in each federated learning round. A coordinator merges the agents’ analyses, and a non‑LLM feasibility check validates the decision before execution. By filtering out clients whose updates would never be aggregated, the system eliminates the main source of wasted round energy in volatile edge networks and works across heterogeneous device classes without per‑class energy models, achieving comparable accuracy to the best energy‑aware baseline while reducing wasted energy from over a third to near zero on a non‑IID CIFAR‑10 benchmark.
By Jiajun Wu, Zirui Wang, Jiayu Zhou, Qiang Ye, Steve Drew
Translating natural-language planning intent into verified plans is a longstanding challenge: people communicate goals in language, while classical planners require formal PDDL specifications. Recent agentic frameworks bridge this gap by orchestrating a pool of specialized repair agents inside a verifier-checked refinement loop, but the orchestrator at the centre is itself a prompted frontier LLM, paying a frontier-LLM API call at every refinement step.
DAGent introduces an Evaluate‑then‑Grow planning approach for deep research agents, building directed acyclic graphs incrementally based on confidence and uncertainty from completed tasks. The framework includes a hierarchical context layer for efficient query handling and a structural reinforcement learning component, DAGRPO, that rewards topology‑conditioned execution. Experiments on BrowseComp‑Plus, GAIA, and xbench‑DeepSearch show DAGent outperforming strong baselines across multiple backbones and scaling to large language models.
By Hanwen Liu, Yuanfu Sun, Qiaoyu Tan
GADAR (Generalizing Across Domains via Action Ranking) is a learned policy for classical planning that accepts a domain description as input and constructs grounded actions in unseen domains without search. It uses a three‑layer architecture—lifted domain, binding, and chain layers—to embed domain structure, tie action applicability to lifted preconditions, and capture schema dependencies. In zero‑shot experiments across eight benchmark domains, a single GADAR model trained on seven domains solves 58.3% of test instances, matching closely the performance of domain‑specific models and outperforming random choice and a representation lacking the chain layer.
By Rajesh Mangannavar, Pranay Dugar, Prasad Tadepalli