arXiv AI
ORDDAR: Observation-Driven Reasoning for Distortion-Resilient Decision, Action, and Cognitive Recovery
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 18
Reflective Recovery: A Self-Supervised Method for Reasoning by Learning from Mistakes
Reflective Recovery is a self‑supervised method that turns failed reasoning attempts into training data, enabling large language models to learn how to correct mistakes during inference. By extracting initial segments of erroneous trajectories and using them as prompts, the approach teaches models to recognize and recover from errors without external critics. Experiments show significant accuracy gains on benchmarks such as AIME 2025 and Minerva, and the method overcomes the scaling collapse problem, fostering emergent self‑correction behaviors.
arXiv AI
Jul 9
Search, Fail, Recover: A Training Framework for Correction-Aware Reasoning
arXiv:2607. 07492v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Many reasoning tasks are not well described by a single left-to-right chain: a solver may need to pursue a plausible branch, observe delayed failure, and return to the latest prefix that can still be completed.
arXiv AI
Oct 28
Experience Memory Graph: Extracting Reusable Correction Knowledge from Agent Trajectories
The paper introduces Experience Memory Graph (EMG), a framework that transforms agent failure recovery into a graph matching problem. By converting failed and successful trajectories into directed action decision graphs, EMG extracts common subgraphs and edit paths that reveal explicit correction strategies, storing them in a memory graph with intra‑task nodes and cross‑task edges. During testing, EMG retrieves relevant insights to guide the agent in a single attempt, improving performance on ALFWorld and ScienceWorld without extra reflection rounds.
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 15
REWIND: Uncertainty-Guided Trajectory Repair for Test-Time Reasoning
arXiv:2610.19561v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: An early mistake in the generated reasoning can constrain all subsequent reasoning. Repeated-generation methods, like MCMC-based approaches, attempt to...
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 17
Learning to Refine Hidden States for Reliable LLM Reasoning
arXiv:2606. 17524v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models show strong reasoning ability, but their internal reasoning process can remain unstable in complex multi-step settings, where early hidden-state errors may propagate to incorrect predictions.
arXiv AI
Jul 3
Safe and Adaptive Cloud Healing: Verifying LLM-Generated Recovery Plans with a Neural-Symbolic World Model
arXiv:2607. 01595v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As the scale and complexity of cloud-based AI systems continue to escalate, ensuring service reliability through rapid fault detection and adaptive recovery has become a critical challenge.