arXiv:2608. 06337v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A monotone adversary observes an i.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv Machine Learning.
arXiv:2608. 14020v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Adding data known to be correct ought to be safe.
We study the problem of \emph{adversarially robust} PAC learning. In this framework, the learner observes independent samples from an unknown distribution over $\mathcal{X} \times \{0,1\}$, as in clas...
arXiv:2609.24260v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study the problem of \emph{adversarially robust} PAC learning. In this framework, the learner observes independent samples from an unknown distrib...
The paper investigates learning with monotone adversarial corruptions, extending previous binary classification results to multiclass and partial binary settings. It shows that even a small number of strategically inserted corrupted examples can render a learnable multiclass problem with DS dimension 2 completely unlearnable, and provides matching upper bounds when the adversary’s budget is sublinear. The work also demonstrates that classic error rates remain attainable under bounded or limited‑view adversaries.
The paper revisits realizable multiclass PAC learning with bandit feedback, correcting a previously claimed lower bound on sample complexity. It introduces a new anchored dimension, “aBDS,” and establishes a constant‑free three‑part lower bound, while also providing tighter upper bounds that eliminate dependence on the total label count. The authors demonstrate that the optimal sample complexity can vary dramatically even among classes with identical dimensional profiles, revealing a confidence direct‑sum phenomenon and a rank‑saturation phase transition.
arXiv:2608. 10869v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Worst-case multiclass bounds do not become smaller when the best classifier is already nearly correct: what is missing is an optimistic rate, a guarantee whose fluctuation scales with the oracle risk itself.