arXiv AI
Numina Fuse: Interactive Autoformalization in Lean 4
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jun 16
SorryDB: Can AI Provers Complete Real-World Lean Theorems?
arXiv:2603. 02668v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We present SorryDB, a dynamically-updating benchmark of open Lean tasks drawn from 78 real world formalization projects on GitHub.
arXiv AI
Sep 1
Prove2Me: An Open Collaborative Platform for Scaling Math Formalization
arXiv:2608.28433v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Proof assistants such as Lean 4 promise the paradigm of formally verified mathematics, but large-scale formalization projects have faced major barr...
arXiv AI
Jul 13
OpenProver: Agentic and Interactive Theorem Proving with Lean 4
arXiv:2607. 09217v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this system paper, we present OpenProver, an open-source system for LLM-driven automated theorem proving (ATP) with integrated Lean 4 formal verification.
arXiv AI
Oct 2
RMA: Context-Orchestrated Research Math Agents
arXiv:2605.22875v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Long-horizon mathematical reasoning fails less often because a model cannot produce a valid next step than because an agent fails to maintain and e...
arXiv AI
Jul 10
From Solvers to Research: Large Language Model-Driven Formal Mathematics at the Research Frontier
arXiv:2607. 07779v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent developments in AI for Mathematics (AI4Math), especially Large Language Model (LLM)-driven theorem provers, has achieved remarkable success in formal proof generation for well-defined mathematical problems through Interactive Theorem Proving (ITP) languages.
arXiv AI
Oct 15
Do Theorem Provers Need Theorem-Proving Agents? mini-Lean-agent: A Coding-Agent Baseline for Lean
arXiv:2610.17331v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: General-purpose coding agents use standard shell and file interactions, yet formal theorem-proving agents often rely on specialized, ad-hoc tooling. Th...