arXiv:2601. 14271v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Shared accountability records are often used by parties who may never agree about causation, responsibility, or normative interpretation.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2601. 16152v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Data systems increasingly operate under persistent legal, political, and analytic disagreement, where no single interpretive authority can be assumed.
arXiv:2609.22961v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic systems increasingly invoke tools, services, data, and other agents across organizational boundaries, yet a relying party cannot assess a del...
The paper proposes a tiered, reusable identity assurance model that separates assurance state from capability gates, allowing participants to disclose only what is necessary for each act. It introduces a typed entity taxonomy, a two‑axis coordinate system for assertion scope and source, and a time‑indexed jurisdiction attribute, with reliance recorded in bitemporal snapshots. The design is evaluated against existing flat‑verification and per‑credential models, addressing cross‑border reuse and data‑erasure versus evidentiary retention concerns.
arXiv:2607. 20729v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A record system declares when two records refer to the same entity, occurrence, scope, or rule.
arXiv:2603. 03971v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Generative AI can convert uncertainty into authoritative-seeming verdicts, intensifying the hypersuasive force of automated speech and displacing the justificatory work on which democratic epistemic agency depends.
The paper introduces a claim‑anchored execution contract that binds a tool‑using agent’s emitted claim to its exact source span, the ordered execution prefix that produced it, and the source version and access state observed. Each receipt contains deterministic anchors, source identifiers, offsets, hashes, quotes, and a domain‑separated execution commitment, allowing a verifier to reconstruct these bindings before semantic or task labels are joined. The contract defines seven independently testable properties and demonstrates high detection rates against cross‑object attacks, with strong performance on conflict‑aware support guard evaluations.